Low Alcohol Beer Subsidies – NSW Isolated

2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998
Productivity Commission Reference – Telecommunications Specific Competition Regulation
June 6, 2000
Input Taxed Supplies not Affected by no ABN Withholding Rules
June 9, 2000
Productivity Commission Reference – Telecommunications Specific Competition Regulation
June 6, 2000
Input Taxed Supplies not Affected by no ABN Withholding Rules
June 9, 2000

Low Alcohol Beer Subsidies – NSW Isolated

NO.046

Low Alcohol Beer Subsidies – NSW Isolated

I welcome the announcement by the Tasmanian Treasurer, Dr David Crean, that Tasmania

will maintain its subsidies for low alcohol beer.

NSW is now isolated in its attempt to gain a financial windfall at the expense of

public health by pocketing the revenue it receives to fund low alcohol beer subsidies.

Tasmania recognises the public health benefits of continuing with State subsidies so as

to maintain a price advantage for low alcohol beer.

Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia have budgeted to maintain their

subsidies for low alcohol beer and obviously recognise the importance of public health

initiatives in their States.

The Victorian Premier has publicly stated that he will act in “good faith” on

the low alcohol beer subsidy. Given that all the States will receive the funds to continue

with their subsidies in their entirety, and the importance to public health of maintaining

the price advantage for low alcohol beer, this can only mean that Victoria will maintain

the subsidy.

NSW is now the only State acting in bad faith by attempting to withdraw the subsidy and

pocket the money at the expense of public health. NSW should now fall into line with all

the other States and maintain its subsidies.

CANBERRA

8 June 2000