Presidential Visits, Free Trade Agreements, Dollar – Interview with Neil Mitchell, 3AW
October 23, 2003Interest Rates – Interview with Steve Liebmann, Today Show, Channel 9
November 5, 2003NO.092
IMF SAYS AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY CONTINUES TO PERFORM STRONGLY
The IMF has predicted continued strong growth in the Australian economy
as a result of sound fiscal and monetary policy and the Government’s
commitment to structural reform. In its annual assessment of the Australian
economy today the IMF states that:
“…Australia’s economy has continued to perform remarkably well
over the past year, despite encountering major adverse shocks, including
persistent weakness in the global economic environment and a sustained,
severe drought at home.”
The IMF says the Australian economy’s ability to generate strong growth
outcomes in a difficult international environment is due to its sound
macroeconomic policies and the continued implementation of structural
reforms. Australia’s economy has outperformed most other advanced countries
in recent years.
IMF staff noted that the outlook remains favourable, with economic growth
expected to pick up in 2004. Beyond 2004, the IMF expects that the existence
of sound fiscal and monetary policy frameworks and the Government’s commitment
to further structural reforms will enable Australia’s economy to continue
to grow strongly and inflation to remain moderate. The current account
deficit is forecast to narrow in 2004 as the farm sector recovers.
The IMF has noted a number of risks to the forecast. The primary risk
is that the international economic recovery will falter. Domestically,
the drought remains a major risk. Although rains have resumed in many
parts of the country, they have not yet been sufficient in some regions
to ensure a strong rebound in agricultural production. The IMF believes
that the recent run-up in housing prices is largely explained by economic
fundamentals, particularly low interest rates and solid income growth.
The IMF also notes as a risk the sharp appreciation of the currency.
The IMF states that Australia’s fiscal strategy is fundamentally sound
and is consistent with the objective of balancing the budget on average
over the course of the economic cycle. The IMF also commended the Government
for producing a “well-conceived and comprehensive strategy”
to deal with the pressures arising from the ageing of the population.
The IMF calls for the implementation of the announced changes to the
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
The complete Article IV Staff Report is available at the IMF’s website
www.imf.org, which can also be
accessed through the Treasurer’s website.
30 October 2003
CANBERRA
Contact: David Alexander
02 6277 7340
International Monetary Fund
700 19th Street, NW
Washington, D. C. 20431 USA
Public Information Notice (PIN) No.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
IMF Concludes 2003 Article IV
On October 22, 2003, the Executive Board of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
with Australia.1
Background
Australia’s economy has continued to perform remarkably well over the
past year, despite encountering major adverse shocks, including persistent
weakness in the global economic environment and a sustained, severe drought
at home. Real GDP growth picked up from 2¾ percent in 2001 to just over
3½ percent in 2002, led by buoyant domestic demand. The strength of domestic
demand reflected an easing of monetary policy in 2001 (which was only
partially reversed in 2002), further moderate fiscal stimulus during 2001/02,
an improvement in the terms of trade, and a competitive exchange rate.
Continued strength in the housing sector-supported by a low interest
rate environment, government incentives to first-time homeowners, and
perceived high rates of return on property-and a robust rebound in business
investment underpinned the growth momentum in 2002. In the first half
of  2003, GDP growth slowed to 1.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annualized
rate), as the drought, weak foreign demand, and appreciation of the Australian
dollar placed a substantial drag on exports. Domestic demand also softened.
Employment growth picked up, bringing the unemployment rate down from
6.8 percent at end-2001 to 5.8 percent in August  2003. Inflation has
remained in check. CPI inflation picked up in early March 2003 to an
annual rate of 3.4Â percent, reflecting a temporary rise in oil prices
and drought-related food price increase; subsequently, it has come back
down, easing to a 2.6 percent annual rate in September 2003. Measures
of core CPI inflation have remained relatively stable and within the
Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA’s) 2-3Â percent official target range.
Housing prices continued to post strong gains, with an index of real
property prices in major cities rising by 18½ percent in 2002 and some
46 percent over the past three years. After significant weakness in 2000-01,
the Australian dollar has strengthened markedly over the past year and
a half, appreciating by June 2003 by almost 30 percent against the U.S. dollar
and by about 12 percent on a real effective basis since its low in early 2002.
The external current account deficit has widened, increasing from about
2.4 percent of GDP in 2001 to 6.7 percent in June 2003.
In response to slowing growth in 2001, the RBA cut the short-term cash
rate six times to a post-war low of 4¼ percent. Monetary conditions also
eased as a result of the depreciating Australian dollar. As domestic
demand recovered strongly, the RBA raised the cash rate by a total of
50 basis points in May-June 2002 to 4¾ percent. Subsequently, the cash
rate has remained unchanged.
With the domestic and international economic environment expected to
strengthen, the May 2002 Budget was intended to withdraw some of the
fiscal stimulus that had been injected in the previous two years. The
Commonwealth budget and the state and local government sector were projected
to be in approximate balance in 2002/03. In the event, Australia’s participation
in the war in Iraq resulted in some unanticipated defense and security
expenditures, while growth was slightly weaker than had been expected.
Nevertheless, revenues proved to be surprisingly robust, and the Commonwealth
budget recorded an underlying cash surplus of 1 percent of GDP in 2002/03.
The May 2003 Budget forecasts small underlying cash surpluses in 2003/04
and over the medium term after the introduction of new measures including
tax cuts and modest expenditure increases in the areas of defense and
domestic security, health care, and higher education.
Real GDP growth is expected to slow to 3 percent in 2003 reflecting continued
sluggish external demand growth, ongoing effects of the drought, and
the appreciation of the exchange rate. Risks to the short-term outlook
have become more balanced, with upside risks becoming more prominent
given continuing strength in domestic demand and recovery in agriculture
from the drought. Downside risks stem from the possibility of further
weakness in external demand and/or appreciation of the Australian dollar.
A sharp correction in housing prices also could have significant adverse
effects across the economy.
Executive Board Assessment
Executive Directors commended the continued strong performance of the
Australian economy in the face of persistent weakness in external demand
and a severe drought at home. They attributed Australia’s ability to
generate robust economic growth with low inflation to the enhanced resilience
of the economy, brought about, in turn, by steadfast pursuit of prudent
macroeconomic policies and structural reforms within transparent policy
frameworks.
Directors acknowledged that a number of risks cloud the economic outlook,
including those generated by the uncertain outlook for external demand,
the drought, rapidly rising property prices, and a sharp appreciation
of the currency. However, they noted that Australia’s economic fundamentals
are strong, and that the authorities remain committed to sound macroeconomic
management and structural reform. Overall, they judged Australia’s near-
and medium-term economic growth prospects to be favorable, and expected
inflationary pressures to be held in check.
Directors noted that the inflation targeting framework has worked well.
They considered the stance of monetary policy during the past year to
have been generally appropriate, and recommended that the authorities
continue to remain cautious and alert to signs of changing circumstances.
Directors considered that the rapid increase in housing prices poses
a challenge for monetary policy in the near term, particularly in view
of the appreciation of the Australian dollar. While agreeing that the
increase in housing prices largely reflects economic fundamentals up
to now, they cautioned that there may be speculative elements at work
in some parts of the market, and that the authorities should continue
to monitor housing market developments closely. Although monetary policy
should not target asset prices, attention has to continue to be given
to the impact that possibly unsustainable increases in housing prices
could have on economic activity and inflation. Directors agreed that
the appreciation of the Australian dollar is generally in line with its
medium-term equilibrium value and is mostly due to the relative strength
of the Australian economy.
Directors regarded Australia’s fiscal position as fundamentally sound,
reflecting the authorities’ disciplined implementation of their policy
framework. Directors endorsed the authorities’ strategy of balancing
the budget on average over the business cycle. They noted the authorities’
preference to use discretionary fiscal policy in a manner that would
make a lasting contribution to potential output rather than just temporarily
boost demand. In this context, they noted that the very sound fiscal
position provided scope for the full functioning of automatic stabilizers.
Directors noted the significant fiscal pressures that the authorities
are likely to face over the longer term as a result of the aging in the
population. They praised the authorities’ strategy to cope with aging-related
pressures. In particular, forward planning was considered preferable
to delaying actions, which may lead to undesirable imbalances in the
future. They also considered that the strategy outlined in the 2003/04
budget to tackle these challenges-which emphasizes raising labor force
participation rates and sustaining strong productivity growth-is comprehensive
and well conceived. Directors noted that the authorities are already
implementing a range of measures in line with this strategy, as well
as exploring other specific options for reforms. They agreed that the
government may need to run somewhat larger budget surpluses than currently
planned in order to build up a sufficient stock of resources to meet
financing needs, particularly for comprehensive reforms in such areas
as the personal income tax and the income support system.
Directors considered sound and stable macroeconomic policies and further
reform of the personal income tax system to be essential elements of
the authorities’ strategy to strengthen growth. They concurred that,
the fiscal position permitting, it would be desirable to raise further
the income thresholds at which the different marginal tax rates apply,
and to bring down over time the top marginal tax rate. Moreover, reductions
in the personal income tax might be needed to maintain an internationally
competitive tax system.
Directors agreed that a comprehensive reform of the complex system of
income support would provide stronger incentives for labor force participation.
They noted that the interplay between the current income support and
the personal income tax system creates high effective marginal tax rates
when individuals move from welfare to work. The transition to work would
be facilitated by reducing these high effective marginal tax rates through
further income tax reform, improved support services-including employment,
job training, and child care services-and a more tapered reduction in
assistance. Tightening eligibility for income support programs and instituting
penalties for breach of obligations with regard to unemployment benefits
would provide stronger incentives to return to employment. Directors
noted that proposed changes to the industrial relations system and investment
in education would also help raise labor market participation rates,
enhance the flexibility of the labor market, and increase labor productivity.
Directors also noted the authorities’ efforts to reduce health care cost
pressures, and urged the authorities to implement the announced changes
to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Directors commended the authorities for their commitment to trade liberalization.
With trade barriers to other countries not being raised, Australia’s
pursuit of bilateral free trade agreements was seen as supportive of
the country’s multilateral liberalization efforts. Directors commended
the authorities for their recent unilateral decision to provide complete
duty- and quota-free market access to the least developed countries.
However, they encouraged Australia to further raise its level of official
development assistance.
Directors noted the soundness of Australia’s financial system, and they
commended the authorities for the steps that have been taken to strengthen
financial supervision. They welcomed the results of the recent stress
tests of the housing loan portfolios of individual banks, which suggest
that these institutions could safely manage a sharp decline in housing
prices and avoid systemic disruptions. Directors agreed, however, that
close supervision of the lending standards and information systems of
financial institutions will need to be maintained. They also welcomed
the steps that have been taken to strengthen supervision of the insurance
industry, and they encouraged the authorities to proceed expeditiously
with their planned reforms to strengthen the governance of superannuation
funds. Directors commended the authorities for their efforts to combat
money laundering and the financing of terrorism, noting that Australia
is in full compliance with the recommendations of the Financial Action
Task Force.
Public Information Notices (PINs) are issued, (i) at the request of a member country, following the conclusion of the Article IV consultation for countries seeking to make known the views of the IMF to the public. This action is intended to strengthen IMF surveillance over the economic policies of member countries by increasing the transparency of the IMF’s assessment of these policies; and (ii) following policy discussions in the Executive Board at the decision of the Board. |
Australia: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 1997-2002 |
|||||||||||
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
||||||
Output and demand (percent change) |
|||||||||||
Real GDP |
3.8 |
5.3 |
4.5 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
3.6 |
|||||
Total domestic demand |
3.6 |
6.6 |
5.7 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
5.9 |
|||||
Private consumption |
4.0 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
|||||
Fixed investment |
9.9 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
-0.1 |
-1.2 |
13.0 |
|||||
Exports of goods and services |
11.1 |
0.1 |
4.4 |
11.0 |
1.3 |
-0.2 |
|||||
Imports of goods and services |
10.5 |
5.9 |
9.1 |
7.4 |
-4.1 |
11.4 |
|||||
Inflation and unemployment (in percent) |
|||||||||||
CPI inflation |
0.3 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
4.5 |
4.4 |
3.0 |
|||||
Unemployment rate (annual average) |
8.2 |
7.7 |
7.0 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
|||||
Saving and investment (in percent of GDP) |
|||||||||||
Gross national saving |
18.7 |
19.0 |
18.9 |
19.3 |
19.1 |
18.1 |
|||||
General government saving |
1.8 |
3.9 |
4.5 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
|||||
Private saving 1/ |
16.8 |
15.1 |
14.5 |
16.5 |
16.1 |
15.3 |
|||||
Gross capital formation |
21.8 |
23.9 |
24.8 |
23.0 |
20.6 |
22.5 |
|||||
Fiscal Indicators (in percent of GDP) 2/ |
|||||||||||
Commonwealth budget |
|||||||||||
Revenue |
24.2 |
24.7 |
26.4 |
24.0 |
3/ |
22.8 |
23.4 |
||||
Underlying expenditure 4/ |
24.0 |
24.0 |
24.3 |
23.1 |
3/ |
23.0 |
22.4 |
||||
Underlying balance 4/ |
0.2 |
0.7 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
-0.1 |
1.0 |
|||||
Commonwealth government net debt |
14.8 |
11.9 |
9.2 |
6.4 |
5.3 |
3.9 |
|||||
Money and credit (end of period) |
|||||||||||
M1 (percent change) |
13.3 |
6.1 |
9.7 |
9.4 |
21.3 |
-9.3 |
|||||
M3 (percent change) |
7.1 |
7.0 |
9.6 |
4.8 |
14.8 |
10.4 |
|||||
Private domestic credit (percent change) |
11.3 |
10.3 |
11.1 |
11.9 |
8.8 |
11.8 |
|||||
Interest rate (90-day bill, in percent) |
5.1 |
4.8 |
5.7 |
6.2 |
4.2 |
4.8 |
|||||
Government bond yield (10-year, in percent) |
6.0 |
5.0 |
7.0 |
5.5 |
6.0 |
5.5 |
|||||
Balance of payments (in percent of GDP) |
|||||||||||
Current account |
-3.1 |
-4.9 |
-5.7 |
-4.0 |
-2.4 |
-4.4 |
|||||
of which: Trade balance |
0.4 |
-1.4 |
-2.5 |
-1.2 |
0.5 |
-1.3 |
|||||
Terms of trade (percent change) |
2.0 |
-4.1 |
-0.9 |
5.5 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
|||||
External assets and liabilities (in percent of GDP) |
|||||||||||
Net external liabilities |
52.5 |
55.1 |
55.0 |
53.8 |
53.6 |
56.9 |
|||||
Gross short-term external debt |
27.7 |
30.6 |
33.1 |
40.1 |
39.9 |
40.9 |
|||||
Net short-term external debt |
14.8 |
17.4 |
17.2 |
22.5 |
23.8 |
22.9 |
|||||
Gross official reserves |
4.8 |
4.3 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
5.2 |
|||||
Exchange rate (end of period) |
|||||||||||
US$/$A |
0.653 |
0.614 |
0.654 |
0.554 |
0.508 |
0.566 |
|||||
Trade-weighted index |
58.4 |
53.3 |
56.4 |
51.7 |
50.2 |
52.0 |
|||||
Nominal effective exchange rate 5/ |
105.5 |
95.3 |
100.3 |
92.0 |
89.8 |
92.9 |
|||||
Real effective exchange rate 5/ |
85.9 |
78.0 |
82.9 |
78.9 |
78.7 |
82.6 |
|||||
Sources: Data provided by the Australian authorities; and Fund staff estimates. |
|||||||||||
1/ Includes public trading enterprises. |
|||||||||||
2/ Fiscal year ending June 30 of the following year. |
|||||||||||
3/ The sharp drop in 2000 reflects tax reform, including income tax cuts, the removal of the Wholesale Sales Tax, and the reduction in grants to States. |
|||||||||||
4/ Underlying expenditure and balance exclude asset sales and other one-off factors; cash basis. |
|||||||||||
5/ IMF, Information Notice System index (1990 = 100). |
1 Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles
of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually
every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments
and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report,
which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board. At the conclusion
of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes
the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to
the country’s authorities. This PIN summarizes the views of the Executive
Board as expressed during the October 22, 2003 Executive Board
discussion based on the staff report.