9 June, Australian dollar, economy, Australian exports, Reserve Bank
June 9, 199818 June, Japanese economy, One Nation, tax package
June 18, 1998
Transcript No. 29 Hon Peter Costello MP 3AW with Neil Mitchell Wednesday, 10 June 1998 SUBJECTS: Interest rates, Australian dollar, growth, tax reform, health, gambling
MITCHELL: fixed rates and others have warned theyll follow. I know that Commonwealth yesterday was quoting 7.6 per cent for a five-year fixed rate compared to 7.1 per cent on Friday, which wont give too much joy to the Federal Government trying to talk the dollar up and keep rates down. With me, the Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello. Good morning.
TREASURER: Good morning, Neil.
MITCHELL: Are the banks being greedy?
TREASURER: Well, I dont think any of them have actually moved rates up yet. Theres talk that in relation to fixed rates theyll be reviewing their situations, but its only talk at this stage. The point Id made in relation to mortgage interest rates is that theyre the lowest in 30 years, that is, theyve never been lower in the last 29 years and I suppose that cant last in perpetuity, but I dont think any of the banks have moved their rates yet.
MITCHELL: Theyve been quoting them that way, but they havent done it officially. But do they need to? Do they really need to, given the state of the economy?
TREASURER: Well, I dont believe that theres any case at the moment for moving rates up, because official rates have not moved. We have official rates. The official rate is whats set by the Reserve Bank and the official rate is what governs the standard variable mortgage interest rate. Thats what most people are on. Thats the one that varies up and down according to movements in the economy. Now our official rates now 5 per cent, lower than the U.S., theyre lower than most countries in the world and they havent moved. So theres no case on the basis of official rates to move standard variable rates.
MITCHELL: Of course, were talking about fixed rates though, fixed rates here. Now, have they got a case to increase those?
TREASURER: Well, in relation to fixed rates what the banks, suppose its a five-year rate. What the bank says is theyre not just interested in what interest rates are theyre interested in what theyre going to be in five years time. Theyre starting to make their own judgments. I heard one banker making the point this morning. A lot of bankers are now saying rates are going to rise arent they? Well, last week they were saying they were going to fall. So, you know, theres been a lot of changed opinions in the banking community.
MITCHELL: Youve been fairly critical of banks in the past if they have jumped too quickly on interest rates, I mean. What do you want them to do now? What do you think they should be doing now, given that your point about official interest rates they still can do as they wish pretty much cant they?
TREASURER: Yes, well the point that I was critical of in the past is that when we were, when the Reserve Bank was cutting interest rates throughout the course of 1996 and 1997, the banks were passing those interest rates cuts on with a significant time delay, sometimes 30 and 40 days. Now I was saying: How come when rates go up you pass them on in 3 and 4, and when rates come down you pass them on 30 and 40. I dont think I ever really got a satisfactory answer to that. So if banks are starting to move on rates that would be a very interesting point to watch, wouldnt it?
MITCHELL: Youll be watching it carefully.
TREASURER: I do watch it.
MITCHELL: Are you going to offer them some advice?
TREASURER: Nobody watches bank interest rates closer than me, I can assure you of that.
MITCHELL: Well, have they got justification on the fixed rate, given its a long, say a five-year term?
TREASURER: Look, I dont think that, as I said before, theres any reason to move rates because official rates have not changed. Now, what banks do is they try and price on assumptions as to what is going to happen not just now but in five years time. Now let me make this point. Last week their assumption was that rates would still fall. The speculation this week that rates over the course of years to come will rise. Theyre starting to warm up the market in relation to that, but I dont think theres any reason to move, nothings happened.
MITCHELL: A fair chance to say theyre not going to fall though, isnt it?
TREASURER: Well, you know, the thing that amazed me is if you look at the money markets, and I look at them very carefully, last week they were pricing, last week, Im talking about seven days ago, they were pricing interest rates falls.
MITCHELL: You were out in public yesterday talking up the dollar, talking about the economic fundamentals which youve got a fair deal of support for, but it hasnt worked has it? Because weve got the banks talking openly about increasing the interest rates and weve got the dollar still under 60.
TREASURER: Well, yesterday what I went out to do was to talk about the Australian economy and to point out that the Australian economy is in very strong shape. I wasnt trying to fix a particular level of the dollar because weve never tried to do that, we have a floating exchange rate, weve had a floating exchange rate since about 1984. And the reason why you have a floating exchange rate is that as external events change, your currency can adjust. Now we are living at the moment through the biggest downturn in the Asian region you and I have ever seen in our lifetime. We have never seen an Asia like this, with the possible exception of China, practically all of Asia is now in recession. Asia has been the boom region of the world for our lifetime. And as a result of that youve seen Asian currencies that have gone down 50, 60, 70 per cent. Now the Australian dollar was allowed to float to maintain some competitiveness. When your competitors are going down 60 and 70, if you had a fixed exchange rate you would become uncompetitive. So the Australian dollar is a floating currency which was allowed to come down in relation to that to preserve our competitiveness. The point I was making yesterday was this, that in the frenzy of financial markets, markets can always overshoot, and the important thing for those that are looking for long-term values is to look at the fundamentals, and the fundamentals of the Australian economy are strong.
MITCHELL: Why is it down then? Why, if the economy is good and its strong, why are we down below 60? Given that you dont accept the rate, you cant be exactly happy about where it is can you?
TREASURER: Well, the reason why the Australian currency is where it is has got a lot to do with the fact that, you know, the rupiah is down about 70 or 80 per cent and the ringits down about 40 and the yen is at 140
MITCHELL: But its only a couple of weeks ago, you were talking about a bullet-proof economy. The bullets got through.
TREASURER: No, no, no. What I was talking about was strengthening the Australian economy to meet this challenge, and the most important part about that was pulling the Australian Government out of deficit into surplus. Let me ask you this question. Where would Australia be now if we were in deficit?
MITCHELL: Well, you tell me the answer.
TREASURER: It would be very shaky.
MITCHELL: Banana republic?
TREASURER: Im not using any phrases, Im just saying that it would be a shaky proposition if we hadnt strengthened the Australian economy over the last two years.
MITCHELL: It doesnt overcome the point that a couple of weeks or so ago you were talking about being bullet-proof. Now we are not bullet-proof are we? We have been hurt by Asia. You say our economys good, we should have been bullet-proof but we are being badly
TREASURER: No, youll always be affected by international developments, not just Asia incidentally, we will be affected by Asia. We will also be affected by world growth, its always been the case and always will be the case. If the U.S. were to turn down fortunately the U.S. is in a strong position at the moment, and when I say strong position not growing as strongly as Australia but in a strong position, and that determines world activity levels and world prices, and thats working to our advantage. But if the U.S. were to turn, we would be in a more difficult position again. But we dont, we didnt create the Asian crisis, but we have to live with it. And living with the Asian crisis means we have to strengthen every area of the domestic Australian economy against this external challenge.
MITCHELL: The Asian crisis is going to hit even harder though, isnt it? So whats ahead for us?
TREASURER: Well, nobody can see into the future. Its hard to think in countries like Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, its hard to think how it could hit even stronger.
MITCHELL: It could hit Australia stronger, it hasnt all got through to Australia has it?
TREASURER: Well, I think in relation to those countries weve taken the hit. In relation to the ASEAN countries, like Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, our exports to those countries have turned down something like 30 per cent. Now its hard to think how you could get another 30 per cent downturn. The good thing is that at the same time weve actually increased our exports to the U.S., to Germany and the U.K. So theres got to be a bit of diversification going on there, but the only country that I would say that were watching very closely at the moment is Japan, of course. Its hard to think how there could be a bigger downturn in Korean or ASEAN, but Japan is still bumping along at no growth, possible negative growth.
MITCHELL: Theres one of the indications of how the crisis can hit even harder. The Financial Review reports today the life insurers, Japans life insurers, including Nippon Life, have stopped investment in Australian stocks and bonds. Now whats that going to do to us?
TREASURER: Well, the Japanese financial sector is in a very sick state.
MITCHELL: Well, what is it going to do to us if, having made that decision, how will it hurt here?
TREASURER: Well, as I said earlier, Japans been in the doldrums for a long time, and this is no new thing. There have been numbers of financial, well there have been financial houses that have fallen over in Japan already, and the Japanese
MITCHELL: What is this decision going to do in Australia, and forget how bad it is in Japan. The decisions been made that they will stop investment here. Whats that going to do to us?
TREASURER: .there have been financial houses that have fallen over in Japan already.
MITCHELL: But what does this decision going to do to Australia? And forget how bad it is in Japan. The decision has been made that theyll stop investment here. Whats that going to do to us?
TREASURER: Well youve seen what its already done to us. That decision wasnt just made yesterday. Japanese financial houses have been under financial pressure, all of them, under financial pressure for a long time and theyve been pulling back all over the world. People think in relation to the Japanese financial system that there are institutions which are loaded with debt, that unless the banking system is able to get those bad debts out of the system, there is a problem with the Japanese banking system.
MITCHELL: Well how long have we got this problem for? How long has Australia got this problem?
TREASURER: Well I think that weve already taken a very significant effect on our exports and its hard to think how it could be worse in relation to the ASEAN countries. We expect that the export performance will pick up over 1998-99, because weve taken such a, we have taken a clip already in relation to growth. But the other side of the situation is the Australian economy. Now lets look at the Australian economy.
MITCHELL: Well look at the growth. You mentioned a clip in regards to growth, the predictions today for the growth are fairly bad, arent they?
TREASURER: Well Australian growth will be clipped, but clipped from what?
MITCHELL: And to what?
TREASURER: Well clipped from – the last National Accounts said 4.9 per cent.
MITCHELL: Growth figures?
TREASURER: The fastest growing country in the industrialised world, leaving aside Finland. 4.9 per cent, leaving aside China, the fastest in Asia. So we are in an incredibly, we have got a head of steam and we are going to be clipped.
MITCHELL: But thats gone isnt it? Isnt that gone?
TREASURER: No, no, no. The head of steam, the 4.9 per cent growth is the most recent figure which is only released about a week ago, right.
MITCHELL: Sure.
TREASURER: Now, what do we think will happen? We think that the 4.9 per cent will gradually slow to something like 3 per cent in the average over 1998-99. Thats slower than 4.9. No doubt about that.
MITCHELL: Isnt it, thats the prediction that you made before all this hit.
TREASURER: No, no, this is, this is
MITCHELL: This is today is it?
TREASURER: We marked down, we marked down growth to take this into account. Which we would have been, we would have been expecting current growth plus and we said we wont get current growth and well add in a minus figure. Now, to put that in context, at 3 per cent, a 3 per cent growth rate in the Australian economy would be faster than Europe and probably faster than the US.
MITCHELL: What about employment? What about your predictions on that?
TREASURER: Well the employment story over the last couple of months has been a good one. Unemployment is now lower than its been for eight years in Australia. And if the economy kept growing at 4 per cent plus, would continue to fall. If the economy grows at 3 per cent then it will fall marginally,but you wont get the increases that you would have otherwise have got. Weve predicted seven and three quarters, high sevens, its currently around about eight.
MITCHELL: Do you think though, youre still being fairly optimistic even at 3 per cent. I notice one of the US banks predicting worse than that today.
TREASURER: Well some banks are predicting less, some are predicting more. I think 3 per cent is about the average. I think when I came out with 3 per cent it was thought to be a little bit low.
MITCHELL: Sure, but you stick with that today? Despite with whats happened in the last few days.
TREASURER: Yes I do. Yes I do.
MITCHELL: Will the currency rebound?
TREASURER: Well over the long term the currency will be fixed at a level justified by the fundamentals and the fundamentals are strong.
MITCHELL: And you, how soon will we see a movement up?
TREASURER: Look when people are taking positions as they are at the moment on the basis of where do you think the movement is going to be, rather than what the fundamentals are, its very much a matter of their assessments. But when the dust clears and they sit down and look at the fundamentals, the fundamentals show a strong economy which is facing an external crisis and weathering it reasonably well.
MITCHELL: Are we doomed to be like this, Australia? I mean you tell me the economy is strong and healthy and yet were going through a crisis like this, and you agree its a crisis?
TREASURER: I agree that the Asian financial meltdown is a crisis, yes I do.
MITCHELL: And its causing a crisis in this country?
TREASURER: Its affecting this country but there is no crisis in Australia.
MITCHELL: Are we doomed then with a healthy economy and everything going well to be such a captive of the region?
TREASURER: We will always be affected by events in the region and the world. Yes. Let me put it the other way. For the last two decades, Australian policy makers went around the world saying were part of Asia. Why? Because they wanted to be part of the region because this was the growth region. Being part of this region was a positive. For the first time in three decades, being part of this region is a negative. In fact weve probably convinced the world we were part of Asia right at the time when it became more of a negative than a positive. Now we will always be affected by it, but as Asia turns in the longer term, that will be an advantage. But I cant say to you, in fact I make this point very strongly. Anybody who thinks that you can seal off the Australian economy, that you can erect walls around it in a way that you wont be affected by the region or the world, is absolutely mistaken. We will always, we always have been, we always will be affected by the region and the world and the important thing is to make sure that you do everything you can to strengthen your position in relation to it.
MITCHELL: Is recession a possibility?
TREASURER: The Australian, no, the Australian economy is growing fast, probably the fastest in the world. The Australian economy will slow as Ive said in relation to Asia and it will slow probably to around US levels, to US levels, which means we wont be the fastest in the world, well probably be in amongst the top half.
MITCHELL: Going to cost jobs? That slowing?
TREASURER: It wont cost jobs, but it will mean that the rate of new job creation will not be as fast.
MITCHELL: Mr Costello, something else, tax. The Housing Industry Association has declared theyre going to fight the GST, which is perhaps the most significant thump the GST has taken. Whats your reaction to that?
TREASURER: Well I think that, look, I can understand that theyre trying to politick on this, I think theyre wrong.
MITCHELL: They say itll cost jobs.
TREASURER: I think theyre wrong and the Housing Industry is just saying what every other industry is saying, its good for everybody else but not for me. Now if we had the whole of Australia saying its good for everybody else to pay tax but not for me, how would you run a tax system?
MITCHELL: They say it will add $14,000 to the cost of an average house.
TREASURER: Well I dispute those figures, but weve always said and in relation to any, and weve said this in relation to Fightback, that in relation to any first homebuyers, if there was an adverse price effect, that you would take measures to equalise that out, which is I think what they want.
MITCHELL: So what do you mean, you say youd give some sort of benefit to a first homebuyer?
TREASURER: You can very easily iron out any adverse affect from that. But people shouldnt think by the way that theyre currently buying houses tax-free. Theres taxes on all sorts of appliances that you put into your house at the moment.
MITCHELL: Is the tax package finished yet?
TREASURER: No, Im still working on that.
MITCHELL: How close?
TREASURER: Pretty close. Its more advanced now than it was before the Budget. Id say probably some months in it.
MITCHELL: Months? Months before you can release it?
TREASURER: Well Im working 14 hours a day, Ill try and lift my work rate a little if youd like. Look this is a big thing. Neil, can I put this in context?
MITCHELL: I know its a big thing. But we expected it
TREASURER: Can I put this in context? We have an income tax system that was set up in 1930 which is now, let me just get this right, nearly 70 years ago, right. We are talking about redesigning something thats been in place for 70 years and building it from the ground up again.
MITCHELL: I understand that. But weve been, I mean most of the country has been operating on the expectation that there will be a tax package announced and wed then go to an election and been looking at August, sometime August. Now youre saying that your package is months off, its June now. July, August, spring time election.
TREASURER: I dont know if people have been speculating on elections, they know things I dont. All Im telling you is this
MITCHELL: You must have talked about it?
TREASURER: I talk about it all the time but Im never told the answer Neil.
MITCHELL: You ask the Prime Minister all the time?
TREASURER: I dont say please tell me the election date but I do say do you feel happy in the spring time or will you feel happier in the summer time. You know I ask sort of questions about all those sorts of things, I never get any answers.
MITCHELL: Does a young Prime Ministers thoughts turn to elections in the spring time?
TREASURER: Could well do. It could turn to all sorts of things Neil, how do we know but .
MITCHELL: Would you be free to go to the football finals?
TREASURER: Yes Ill be free to go to the football finals.
MITCHELL: You wont be working on the tax package then?
TREASURER: Ill take, well it depends whether Essendons playing. If its West Coast and Adelaide I may not be free to go to the football final but if its Essendon I can assure you that I will not be working between 2.00 and 5.00 pm on the last Saturday in September.
MITCHELL: Will the GST rate stay once its introduced at the rate it is, it wont be moved?
TREASURER: Absolutely.
MITCHELL: Is there a need for a reduction in the top personal rate and the corporate rate?
TREASURER: I think that our marginal income tax rates are too high, yes I do.
MITCHELL: Will they stay at the rate theyre set at then?
TREASURER: Well they should unless they come down further. I wouldnt rule out bringing them down I mean if you were to say to me today, do you intend to set a top marginal rate which can never move, I would say to you no, I intend to set a top marginal rate which, over time, we could move down. I think the whole trick in Australia, if I may say so, is, weve got the Budget in balance we dont need any more money. This is the whole point people have got to understand. We are not looking for money here. Now as we get a better tax system and a more efficient economy, we should be looking for moving rates down.
MITCHELL: What about the corporate rate, move that down as well?
TREASURER: Well I think that with the corporate rate weve got to bear in mind that we are again in tax competition in the region and weve got to make sure its competitive, thats all Ill say, competitive.
MITCHELL: What do you think of the 30, 30, 10 scenario, does it add up?
TREASURER: No.
MITCHELL: What does?
TREASURER: Next question.
MITCHELL: How are you going to sell it?
TREASURER: Well are we, as weve said, we are going to engage in an information campaign. The first thing that weve got to tell people is how the current tax system works. Now theres a lot of people for example who say, oh a GST that must be a new tax, its in addition to current taxes. Its not, a GST replaces other taxes which are abolished, wholly abolished and they dont even know that they are even paying these other taxes, like the wholesale sales tax and other taxes. And of course thats part of the misrepresentation of the whole package.
MITCHELL: Will there be packages at the bottom end to help people who are, perhaps even tax credits, to help people on lower incomes?
TREASURER: Oh yes, because at the end of the day, what we want to do is help those at the lower end of the income scale. One of the problems they face at the moment, this is a very important point that I keep on trying to make, is that if you are a low income earner, lets say you are on about $20,000, and youve got a wife and a family. As you earn more, not only do you pay more tax but you start losing benefits. You lose family allowance benefits, you can start being priced out of health rebates and you get to a stage where by earning more you can take home less.
MITCHELL: If you look at the whole thing, will everybody be paying less tax?
TREASURER: No, some people will pay more.
MITCHELL: Who?
TREASURER: People who currently avoid their tax liabilities.
MITCHELL: What about high income earners, if they are not avoiding their tax?
TREASURER: People who operate in the cash economy are going to pay more tax.
MITCHELL: Black economy?
TREASURER: Yeah.
MITCHELL: What about the high income earners, will they be paying more tax, provided theyre following the law at the moment?
TREASURER: They wouldnt, if theyre paying their full amount, then they wouldnt be paying. Suppose theyre paying their full income tax at the moment. We all know by the way that after you get to a certain level in income you manage to sort of get out of the income tax system. Well, lets suppose there is somebody today who is a high income earner who is paying 48.5 per cent on every dollar they earn. It is conceivable that they could pay more if they happen to be big spenders, because the GST will effect things that they currently buy for free like aeroplanes and caviar. It depends on their consumption I mean if you want to hop on a Lear jet and go to Paris and buy some caviar, youre not taxed at the moment, you realise that, under the wholesale sales tax. If you want to go down to the supermarket and buy some personal toiletries, you are.
MITCHELL: The Victorian, just something else, the Victorian Treasurer, because we are nearly out of time, Mr Stockdale seems to be suggesting a means test for public hospitals today that because of the dispute over funding, which I think has to be signed by tonight if they are going to get it. Whats your reaction to a means test of public hospitals?
TREASURER: I havent seen his comments, I cant comment on them but its certainly not Federal Government policy.
MITCHELL: Is that health problem nearly sorted out do you know?
TREASURER: I hope so, look I hope so. I think that there are a lot of good things in the package thats available, including by the way, theres $4 million a week once the agreements signed to get down waiting lists. If you sign today you get your share of $4 million to get down waiting lists which I think is a great idea.
MITCHELL: A bit of a mess the hospitals, arent they?
TREASURER: Look I think, let me put this in context, by world standards the Australian health system is considered on of the best, having said that it needs to be improved.
MITCHELL: Gambling, will you rewrite the guidelines as Jeff Kennetts asked?
TREASURER: I will take on board some of his points but I will not be accepting all of them, no.
MITCHELL: Will the inquiry cover things like bingo, horse racing?
TREASURER: Yes.
MITCHELL: Really, bingo.
TREASURER: Yes, they can look at it. I dont think people are worried about bingo and horse racing by the way. When were looking at the effects on problem gamblers and the effects on the economy what people are most interested in my view are slot machines, poker machines and casinos. And I expect that to be its principal focus.
MITCHELL: I asked you whenever we speak, which is not as often these days, but would you like to be leader one day?
TREASURER: Leader of what?
MITCHELL: Australia.
TREASURER: Oh, of Australia.
MITCHELL: Prime Minister.
TREASURER: Oh well as you know its one of those questions you always ask me and its one of those questions I never answer.
MITCHELL: Do you think you might answer it one day?
TREASURER: One day yes, perhaps when Ive retired.
MITCHELL: You dont think youre a bit closer than you were last time I asked you.
TREASURER: To retirement.
MITCHELL: To leadership.
TREASURER: Im probably about a year closer to retirement now.
MITCHELL: Alright, oh theres one other thing, I had a bet with you about football, Melbourne Essendon, I need to pay you.
TREASURER: Oh thanks.
MITCHELL: And I can give you an option, Australian dollars, US dollars, which do you want?
TREASURER: Ill take the A dollars because youre offering me one US dollar for 50 A dollars.
MITCHELL: That was a five actually.
TREASURER: Oh its only a five, Ill still take the five thanks very much.
MITCHELL: Thank you very much for your time.
TREASURER: Thanks very much. |