Petrol prices, terrorism, Labor Party – Interview with Tracey Grimshaw, Today Show
September 27, 2005Address to the Merrill Lynch Australian Investment Conference, New York
September 29, 2005Doorstop Interview
Australian Embassy
Washington
Wednesday, 28 September 2005
1.00 pm
(Washington Time)
SUBJECTS: Petrol prices, economy, US trip
TREASURER:
Well, in a round of discussions with US economic leaders and international
economic leaders, there’s no doubt that the greatest threat to the world
economy at the moment is oil and petrol prices. There are two components of
petrol prices; the first is the price of crude oil, the second is the refining
capacity – the capacity to make petrol from it. The good news is after
the second hurricane, Hurricane Rita, there doesn’t appear to have been
any more damage to refining capacity, and that means that the extraordinary
spike we saw in the wake of the first hurricane should gradually pass through
the system. Unfortunately, the world oil price looks as if it’s going
to be high for some time, and that means that Australian consumers are going
to be paying higher prices at the bowser than they were last year and for quite
some time – although, not at the levels we saw with the spike after the
hurricane.
Let me make it clear that petrol prices, high petrol prices, are in no-one’s
interest. They’re not in the interest of the consumer, they’re not
in the interest of business, they’re not in the interest of government,
they’re not in the interest of the world economy. But until such time
as refining capacity comes back in full and the world oil production increases
we, unfortunately, will have to live with higher prices than we’d like.
And it may well focus attention, which would be a good thing, on other alternatives
such as biofuels.
JOURNALIST:
US President George Bush this week has urged Americans to drive less and do
other things to conserve fuel. Is that something you’d be encouraging
Australians to do as well?
TREASURER:
We saw in the wake of the higher petrol prices that sales of four-wheel drives,
large four-wheel drives, in Australia came off. That is a totally predictable
response and not a bad thing. That if prices are going to be high for some time,
it’s very costly to drive big four-wheel drives and more efficient use
of fuels on more efficient cars is one way of responding, and a good way of
responding, to that price surge.
JOURNALIST:
What about driving less though?
TREASURER:
Well, look, for most Australian commuters I think that they don’t have
a choice. They’re commuting to and from work. They don’t have the
choice of not going to work. They may have the choice of going with friends
or they may have the opportunity to have a more efficient car. And if more efficient
cars and more efficient fuels are available, I think that’s certainly
worth looking for.
JOURNALIST:
Why not cut taxes, Treasurer, on petrol if it’s so important?
TREASURER:
Well, as you’ve seen the petrol price here in America is at all time
highs, as it is in Europe and Asia and Australia. Petrol price is not an effective
tax. It’s a worldwide event, and it’s a worldwide event because
oil is a worldwide commodity and refining capacity affects the price on a global
scale. And an Australian tax change is not going to do anything about world
oil prices.
JOURNALIST:
So what impact will the high price of oil have on the Australian economy? What
do you project for the next 12 months?
TREASURER:
It will have two effects. It will moderate growth to a small degree, I don’t
want to overstate it, but in a small degree it will moderate things. Secondly,
it will have an effect on the Consumer Price Index. It will mean that the Consumer
Price Index would be higher than otherwise. When we’re looking at interest
rate policy, we look through the direct effects of petrol on the Consumer Price
Index, but if it were to get into the transport system and back into the economy,
then it could move underlying inflation. So we’ll have to be very careful
that it doesn’t do that.
JOURNALIST:
Is there a rough measure between petrol prices increasing and an equivalent
interest rate increase, for instance?
TREASURER:
Well, if people spend more on petrol, it’s less money they’ve got
to spend on other things. And generally speaking, when petrol prices go up,
consumption in the economy is more subdued. That’s why I say high petrol
prices are not good for the Australian economy, they’re not good for consumers,
and they’re not good for business, and they’re not good for the
Government.
JOURNALIST:
So high petrol prices reduce the need for rises in official interest rates
if they’re a de facto rate rise?
TREASURER:
Well, I’m not putting it like that. What I’m saying is that petrol
prices do tend to dampen consumption and I don’t regard that as a good
thing. That is a bad thing for consumers, for business, for the Government and
for the economy.
JOURNALIST:
So are you ruling out any action on the petrol excise?
TREASURER:
Petrol excise in Australia is 38 cents. We cut it in 2001 and we abolished
indexation. It has not increased since 2001 and it will not increase. It’s
38 cents when the price is a dollar. It’s 38 cents when the price is $1.30.
It’s not the cause of increasing petrol prices and changes in relation
to taxation are not going to deal with the increases that you’ve seen.
JOURNALIST:
So you’ll rule out any alteration in excise?
TREASURER:
I’m saying that changes in excise will not counteract what is really
causing high petrol prices, which is global oil prices and refining capacity.
JOURNALIST:
The World Economic Forum has put Australia in the top 10 of the world’s
most competitive economies in a report released overnight. What’s your
response to that?
TREASURER:
Well, I welcome the fact that the World Economic Forum has moved Australia
into the top 10 competitive economies of the world. Australia performs very
well in relation to employment, inflation, the budget position, the transparency
of its institutions – very well indeed. There was only one indicator that
we performed badly on, and that was the real exchange rate. We were rated 113th
out of 117. But, as you know, the Government doesn’t set the exchange
rate, that’s set by markets. So, there is nothing that we will be doing
about that. We note it. We note that the high Australian Dollar has made things
tougher for our exporters, but it’s not something that Government controls.
Leaving that aside, the fact that Australia is now in the top 10 competitive
economies of the world says that we’re open for business, and we’re
open for jobs, and that’s a good thing for Australians.
JOURNALISTS:
The report also expresses concern about what it says are the imbalances caused
by the big trade and budget deficits here in the US. Is that something that’s
come up in your conversations this week?
TREASURER:
Oh, sure. The budget deficits and trade deficits of the United States are of
concern in relation to the world economy. And the IMF, the World Bank and, I
think, even many US policy makers would say that they need to be carefully watched.
If you got to a situation where those imbalances led, for example, to a big
realignment of exchange rates or currencies around the world, that could affect
the globe. It is something that Australia would have to live with, and we would
like to see an orderly adjustment rather than some big and unexpected sudden
adjustment, which could come if there was a change of sentiment in relation
to those imbalances.
JOURNALIST:
Who else have you seen, Treasurer, while you’ve been in Washington?
TREASURER:
Last weekend was the World Bank and IMF meetings, and I took the opportunity
to see the President of the World Bank, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve,
Doctor Greenspan, to talk about economic developments. I’ve met the Deputy
Secretary of State, and I’ve been down to the Director of National Intelligence
and seen General Hayden who’s the 2IC down there, and this afternoon I’ll
be having further intelligence briefings and meeting with the Vice President.
JOURNALIST:
Have you met with the Vice President yet?
TREASURER:
No, this afternoon.
JOURNALIST:
Are you meeting him at his house in the observatory?
TREASURER:
No, the White House.