Personal Income Tax Cuts
May 10, 2005Labor’s Budget Reply – Doorstop Interview, Parliament House, Canberra
May 12, 2005Interview with Alan Jones
2GB
Wednesday, 11 May 2005
7.20 am
SUBJECTS: Budget
JONES:
Treasurer good morning.
TREASURER:
Alan good to be with you.
JONES:
You too. First can I ask you this because there will be widespread recognition
of the job that’s been done last night, but given that you have just had
a thumping election victory, given that you are going to have control of the
Senate, given that you have got very significant surpluses, are we going to
see at any point a complete overhaul of an unreadable Tax Act and an unwielding
tax system?
TREASURER:
Well that is partly why we did what we did last night Alan, because with the
possibility now of getting legislation through the Senate which the Labor Party
has blocked we could do things that frankly should have been done earlier. Abolishing
the superannuation surcharge which I announced last night…
JONES:
That will be immediate won’t it?
TREASURER:
From 1 July, no further surcharge. That was one of the most complicated parts
of the Tax Act. We have also increased thresholds so that 97 per cent of Australians
won’t even have to bother with the top tax rate.
JONES:
But you understand don’t you, that once upon a time a tax cut was a big
thing and it was a cause of significant excitement. But now today’s people
think, well that is terrific and you will be given full credit for that. But
we still have to pay tax on our petrol, tax on our cigarettes, tax on our grog,
a GST, there are a whole raft of property taxes at state level, a whole raft
of other taxes and so does the tax system need an overhaul? The Tax Act, you
have never heard it, I have never heard it, no one can read it.
TREASURER:
Well, for most Australians there is no need to read it because most of the
provisions of the Tax Act Alan relate to complicated business transactions,
they don’t apply to ordinary wage and salary earners. For an ordinary
wage and salary earner, tax is taken out when they are paid their income, they
might have some tax on their interest and that is it. They don’t have
to worry about trusts, they don’t have to worry about dividends, they
don’t have to worry about international taxation – that is the kind
of stuff that companies do. What they are interested in is the rates they will
pay and the message out of last night’s Budget is that Australians, all
Australians, are going to pay less tax. We are going to get a much more competitive
income tax system, you won’t even have to worry about the top rate of
income tax until you are over $125,000. Only 3 per cent of Australians have
a taxable income of $125,000, so 97 per cent of Australians just completely
drop out of that top tax rate.
JONES:
Just explain your philosophy because it does need explaining today. Supposing
the bloke out there who is just – and I will just take it as a single person
to start with – and he is on $50,000. So, he will get about $6 a week
back, and the bloke on $100,000 will most probably get what, $60 a week back.
Is this an incentive for people to better themselves, improve themselves, be
more productive, earn more and so on?
TREASURER:
Absolutely, and if you are a middle income earner you won’t face a tax
rate higher than 30 per cent. You can do overtime, you can do some extra hours,
some people may even be able to get a part-time job. In addition you won’t
pay a top rate above 30 per cent and…
JONES:
Until you get to $70,000.
TREASURER:
…until you get to $70,000 and that is to give people an incentive. Now,
just to put that in context, 80 per cent of Australians are on incomes of $70,000
or less. Average weekly earnings in Australia are around about $40,000, so you
will have that big, big incentive there.
JONES:
Did you consider raising the tax free threshold for the lower income earners,
not for everybody, but for the lower income earners?
TREASURER:
I looked at those sorts of things over the years Alan. That actually is one
of the areas where you get complications with tax free thresholds and then people
do try and use them up through trusts, distribute money to various members of
the family to take advantage, and I think actually high tax free thresholds
do in fact complicate the taxation system.
JONES:
Is there a problem with your 42 and 47 cents staying in place even though you
have increased very significantly the point at which you enter those two, while
the company tax rate stays at 30 per cent. Because that is the most significant
tax avoidance avenue, isn’t it?
TREASURER:
Well look, there is a lot of talk about that but I think much of it is overblown.
The fact of the matter Alan is a company pays tax at 30 cents, when it distributes,
then the difference between your individual tax rate and that company tax rate
has to equalised. If you are below 30 cents, you get some money back. If you
are above you have to pay the difference. But when the distribution occurs through
a dividend the difference is made up. So a lot of people run around and say
you know, talk as if this is some huge difficulty in the tax system, I don’t
believe it is and I just say to some of those tax experts, I know it is not
you, it is people that you will get you know, out of the business sector, I
would just say to them, there aren’t that many countries around the world
incidentally, that do equalise their corporate tax rate and their top marginal
tax rate.
JONES:
Now I have got to say to you, I mean the story last night when you heard all
of that sort of stuff you have to think holy Nelly, there are not too many people
in this country would swap to be anywhere else, I mean…
TREASURER:
Oh look, Alan…
JONES:
…that is the overwhelming conclusion that you draw when you hear all
of that.
TREASURER:
…well look, what I was trying to say last night is this is not an accident,
it is not a fluke, some people say, oh Australia is just blessed by God, you
know, it is just the country that is better than all of the others. It is not.
We have to work at our future in this country Alan. This is the message –
we have to work it out…
JONES:
Just on that working at your future, it is disturbing, isn’t it, that
one in six Australians now depend exclusively on welfare, 3 in 10 get some,
that is a hell of a thing. I mean you take last night $100 million from tax,
you have got to give back $80 million in welfare, but I was reading where 60
per cent of sole parents who don’t have a job left school before year
10. Many have children with learning difficulties. Now who is going to employ
them with all the best philosophy in the world?
TREASURER:
Well Alan, the unemployment rate today is the lowest it has been in 28 years,
so your chances of getting a job today are better than they have been in the
last 28 years. If there is ever going to be a time in Australia where we try
and encourage people out of welfare and into work it is now. Now, you talk about
the single parents, we want to encourage single parents when their kids go to
school – not before their kids go to school, but when their kids go to school
– to try and look for part-time work. That means we have to increase childcare
places for them. Last night I announced 84,000 new outside of school hours childcare
places for those parents…
JONES:
And will the lower socio-economic have priority in that?
TREASURER:
…well they are distributed, they run at schools.
JONES:
But I mean if there is a single parent and the child gets sick or on holidays,
I mean, and do they pay for that or will it be subsidised?
TREASURER:
Oh it is a very small amount, it is what they call the full-care or after-care,
generally at the local school, they will start it up at 7.30 am, you can drop
the kids off at 7.30 am before school, you can pick them up after school, so
it gives parents a longer working day if they have got transport arrangements.
Now, you know, Alan let me make this point…
JONES:
People say though that in a wealthy country as we are, it is a bit hard to
be tackling the vulnerable people like the single parents who often aren’t
single of their own choice and often aren’t out of work by their own choice.
TREASURER:
…well look, I agree a lot of people aren’t single of their own
choice, but let’s make this point Alan, there are a lot of single mothers
that do work, a lot of them work full-time, many of them work part-time. This
idea that a single mother can’t work, I actually think…
JONES:
So you are after the people that can work and refuse to or are offered a job
and don’t take it, they are the people you are trying to…
TREASURER:
…well that is right. People who are able bodied, who are of working age,
whose kids are at school, who will still get their family tax benefits, we are
just saying to those people, if you are able bodied and the kids are at school
during the day, wouldn’t it be a good idea to look for some part-time
work. There are a lot of single mothers that do it, it is not as if it can’t
be done in a modern society, Alan.
JONES:
Okay, Future Fund, not one, you didn’t mention the word water once last
night. You know my views, I think it is the greatest crisis facing us. You did
say that the Telstra sale money – about $33 billion – will go to a Future Fund.
How do all of your National Party MPs go to the electorate today and tell them
that Telstra will be sold, that the money will be locked up in a Future Fund.
Who is going to invest that, who decides what the mandate for investment is
and is there any chance of a major infrastructure programme out of the Future
Fund to water Australia?
TREASURER:
Well, there will be an independent board, it will be governed by a statute,
it will not be capable of being raided by politicians for their own pet projects
Alan and I think that is important. I think the public of Australia would want
to know that these big investments for the future won’t be turned to political
advantage, that they will be turned to the national interest. Now, that fund
will have a significant amount of money which it will be able to invest. It
is quite possible that it could invest some of that money in some of the infrastructure
projects that go on.
JONES:
Treasurer, it is coming up to 7.30 am, I will stay with the Treasurer because
this is most probably the most important issue beyond income tax and welfare
in the Budget, the Future Fund. So Treasurer come again, you are going to put
$16 billion of your surpluses now into the fund and when Telstra is sold another
$33 billion, if I could come back to my point, you are going to have to explain
to people in the bush that that is going to be locked up, not to improve roads,
schools, hospitals or water, but to pay generous pensions to retiring public
servants.
TREASURER:
When you say it is going to be locked up, it is going to be invested and it
could be invested in projects, you know, there are a lot of road building projects
that are going on in Sydney at the moment as you know…
JONES:
Water projects?
TREASURER:
…well there are some, actually, and if somebody puts forward a project
which offers some kind of security and look for investors and the arms length
directors of the Future Fund believe it is a good investment for the money that
they are holding, yes, of course they would be able to invest it.
JONES:
But see you come from the suburbs, I come from the bush. Now, not far up the
highway, if you drive to Goulburn, there is a town, a community of 30,000 people
in absolute disarray, they are almost completely out of water. The dam which
supplies them, you could drive a car across it, they are not allowed anything
outside, you can’t water a garden, that looks like the Gobi Desert. Do
you think people in your Cabinet, when you sit around there understand the gravity
of the water crisis especially when this country has a lot of water, we just
don’t have it where it is needed and we need some of this money, unlock
some of this money to try to water Australia.
TREASURER:
Well Alan, we do understand about Goulburn, we had a discussion about the water
crisis in Australia yesterday. But let’s be frank about it Alan, look,
the water crisis in Australia is principally caused by the lack of rainfall.
JONES:
We have got plenty of water, we have got plenty of water.
TREASURER:
Well hang on Alan, we are in one of the most severe droughts that we have ever
had.
JONES:
But how do we quarantine ourselves from drought Peter? How do we quarantine
ourselves so that we don’t go through this again?
TREASURER:
And…
JONES:
Do we build dams?
TREASURER:
Well I think we should…
JONES:
Do we pipe water?
TREASURER:
…well I think we should be building dams, yes of course I think we should
be building dams.
JONES:
So who is going to apply to the Future Fund to say, we have got a terrific
project here to build 15 dams, we want you to unlock some of this money. Now
they will say, well hang on, it won’t get us 10 per cent which we can
get somewhere else so there won’t be any money for it?
TREASURER:
Well as you know, the Federal Government is not in control of building dams,
you know that Alan. But do I think more dams ought to be built? Yes I do. Do
I think that the State Governments have misled their responsibility? Yes I do.
Do I think that the Federal Government has to now start knocking some of these
State Governments and talking to them about water? Yes I do. We have a $2 billion
National Water Initiative which we are trying to get these States to sign up
to, to get some kind of national sense in relation to them. It is out there
at the moment, we can’t even sign them all up to it. So, Alan I think
we have got to get those levels of Government cooperating in relation to the
National Water Initiative, we have got to get much better property rights in
relation to water. But I will make this one last point and it is this: that
if it doesn’t rain, you are going to have a problem with water and we
are living through a very, very severe drought at the moment…
JONES:
But what I am saying…
TREASURER:
…if I could break a drought I would Alan, I promise you that.
JONES:
…but the bank of water north of the tropic of Capricorn, we bring gas
from the north of the tropic of Capricorn by pipes, that is a major thing, it
is like the Snowy Mountains Scheme. Why don’t we at least investigate
or put an initiative forward from the national Government to see how we can
unlock the water reserves we have got in Western Australia and northern Australia
to see whether we can’t flood the Murray Darling system and have that,
it is going to cost money but we have got the money.
TREASURER:
Well let me make this point Alan, somebody did put forward a proposal to pipe
water down in the last West Australian election…
JONES:
Oh yes that (inaudible) Barnett, I mean he gave two minutes thought to it…
TREASURER:
…well, he put it forward, didn’t he…
JONES:
…he did put it forward.
TREASURER:
…and I said at the time I thought it should be the subject of a full
feasibility study, I thought it was well worth looking at. As it turned out
that was taken to be critical of Barnett, I didn’t think it should have
been. The other thing I think we are going to have to investigate in Australia
is desalination. Desalination is quite possibly the future.
JONES:
But when? Tomorrow?
TREASURER:
Well tomorrow, yes, now, now, now, today, desalination. It has been looked
at. The West Australian Government in fact has got a plan for a desalination
plant. These Premiers who have got to be held responsible for something and
they are responsible for water are looking at it as far as I know but I have
brought down the Federal Budget, I am responsible for the national taxation
system, the state of the federal budget, I take responsibility in relation to
monetary policy, I have got an initiative in relation to welfare to work, I
have got the biggest plan yet to try and put services to help people get back
into work. We brought it down last night. This will be good for Australia’s
economy, Australia’s economy, if it is strong, will be able to give us
a better standard of life.
JONES:
Excellent, just one final point that I am going to make which is the first
question I asked you. Given that you have had this thumping election victory
and you are going to control the Senate and you have managed the economy – and
you have got to be given full credit for an outstanding job, there are surpluses,
you are giving some back – will we see though major reform because we now control
both houses in a way which will set us up at a tax, infrastructure and health
level for the future?
TREASURER:
Well the major reform that you are seeing began last night. We are revolutionising
the way in which welfare and work interplay. We are cutting tax rates, we are
abolishing superannuation surcharges, we are setting up the biggest investment
fund in Australia’s history and we are putting in place the measures which
will fund this country for 30 years.
JONES:
Okay, good to talk to you and thank you for your time.
TREASURER:
Thanks for being with you Alan.