OECD Report, air warfare destroyers – Press Conference, Treasury Place, Melbourne
February 3, 2005ANZ job advertisements; RBA Statement; industrial relations; economy; Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; tax cuts; interest rates – Doorstop Interview, Parliament House, Canberra
February 7, 2005Doorstop Interview
Premier Motors
393 Scarborough Beach Road
Osborne, Perth
Friday, 4 February 2005
10.30 am (Perth Time)
SUBJECTS: Economy; motor vehicle sales; WA election; National Water Initiative
TREASURER:
For three years in a row now Australia has achieved record motor vehicle sales.
And if the sales for January of 2005 are an indication, it looks like we could
be headed for another record year. That is an indication of confidence in the
economy and the renewal of the Australian car fleet of course is good for the
environment.
The price of a car since 1996 in CPI adjusted terms has fallen 16 per cent.
The reason for that is the abolition of wholesale sales tax and the reduction
of tariffs. But at a time when the price of cars has been coming down unfortunately
the stamp duty on cars has been going up. And it has been going up here in Western
Australia. And it means that Western Australians are paying more in stamp duty
on cars than ever before. And I think the initiative that has been announced
by Colin Barnett in the state election campaign to cut stamp duty on cars is
very welcome. It will be good for the consumers of WA, it will be good for the
employers of WA and by putting extra money back in people’s pockets that
will help with the renewal of the fleet and that will have good environmental
consequences.
So, when the Government, the Commonwealth Government, introduced GST it was
always our intention that it would provide a strong revenue base for states
to cut taxes and I welcome the announcement by Colin Barnett that he is determined
to do that.
JOURNALIST:
What are you doing during your visit Mr Costello to support Mr Barnett campaign?
TREASURER:
I have been doing a number of functions, business functions and other functions
to support his election effort. And today I am highlighting what I think to
be one of the great practical initiatives that he has announced during the course
of this campaign which is the reduction in stamp duty on cars. You see the price
of cars is coming down because we abolished wholesale sales tax and we are reducing
tariffs. But the stamp duty, the state stamp duty on cars has been going up.
And that has been undermining a lot of the good price work that we have been
trying to accomplish at the federal level.
JOURNALIST:
Treasurer retail sales figures came in lower than expected. What effect is
that going to have on GDP growth forecasts?
TREASURER:
Well for the month of December retail trade was down 0.3 per cent which indicates
that there has been a slowing in retail trade. During that period incidentally,
we have been seeing strong employment and we have been seeing real wages growth.
So it is interesting that retail trade moderated somewhat. It is not unwelcome
particularly if the household sector has taken the opportunity to add to savings.
JOURNALIST:
But can you still keep (inaudible) per cent GDP growth forecast?
TREASURER:
Well as I said, it is not unwelcome. We would actually like to see savings
increase and if money is going into savings we would actually welcome that.
As to the Government’s forecasts, we put out forecasts twice a year. We
do it mid-year which I did shortly before Christmas and the next time we will
do it is at Budget.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible) disagree with Colin Barnett on two issues – extended trading
hours and the canal. Is that going to reflect badly on him in this election
campaign?
TREASURER:
Well I have not disagreed with him at all on the canal. In relation to trading
issues, trading hours, I have my own views. Individual views and individual
people will no doubt reflect that in the referendum. What I have said in relation
to the canal is that if a Barnett Government signs the National Water Initiative
then they would be eligible for federal funding. And Western Australia is not
eligible for federal funding at the moment because the Gallop Government won’t
sign the National Water Initiative.
JOURNALIST:
So do you think such a project would require a major study before committing
that sort of money?
TREASURER:
Well let me make this point, that a state government can build any project
it likes any time.
JOURNALIST:
But…
TREASURER:
And let me go through it…
JOURNALIST:
…Federal Government support…
TREASURER:
Well no. A state government can build any project it likes at any time out
of either its own tax base or its GST revenues. If a state government wants
a federal contribution to a state project then it has to come within a federal
programme. As it turns out we have a federal programme which can assist with
water initiatives. It is called the National Water Initiative. It is a $2 billion
programme. And if WA signs it they are eligible for it. But Premier Gallop won’t
sign it so there is no eligibility at the moment. The only way you could get
into that programme would be if the government changed its view.
JOURNALIST:
Or if Mr Barnett says that he would sign that. So where does that leave the
Federal Government’s stance?
TREASURER:
Well…
JOURNALIST:
Would you support the canal?
TREASURER:
Well I welcome the fact that he would sign the National Water Initiative because
that makes Western Australia eligible for up to $2 billion of funding. Now let
me make it clear, Western Australia is not going to get the total federal funding
of $2 billion because it has to be shared around the states. And once they have
signed it, then they can put forward their proposals. And Western Australia
will be eligible for funding and will get funding under a National Water Initiative.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
Well the project has not actually been put to the Federal Government. It can’t
be put until there is a change of government and the government signs the National
Water Initiative. But I welcome it and it will open the possibility of funds
to Western Australia which are currently being denied by the Gallop Government.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
No you can’t sign the National Water Initiative until you are elected.
And he has to get elected, then he can sign the water initiative, then he is
eligible for funding up to $2 billion. He has got to do the things in these
orders.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible) retail sales figures. (inaudible) OECD view that a strong economy
is going to cause half a per cent interest rate rise by the end of the year
Mr Costello? (inaudible) indicated that the economy is not as strong as the
OECD thinks for instance?
TREASURER:
Well the OECD publishes its forecasts and we publish ours. The OECD forecasts
are not the same as ours. Both the OECD and us forecast continuing growth in
the Australian economy but there are differences between them. If you ask me
which I prefer, I prefer mine.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
I really prefer mine.
JOURNALIST:
Is there any implication to monetary policy then (inaudible)?
TREASURER:
In relation to retail trade? Well as I said, I think the retail trade figures
show that there is some slowing in relation to consumption. Now that is not
unwelcome. I have been talking for some time about the need for slowing in the
housing market and I have also been saying it would be a welcome thing if people
were saving more. Now if this figure, and let’s not get too carried away
with one month’s figure, but if this figure indicates that people are
rebuilding savings then actually it is quite a welcome figure.
JOURNALIST:
But it is not a worrying sign about the economy at this stage?
TREASURER:
Oh no, the Australian economy is in pretty good shape. The Australian economy
is now growing at a 3 per cent growth rate, on a 2 per cent inflation rate,
with the lowest unemployment in 30 years. We haven’t been in this kind
of territory for 30 years. And the important thing – and I keep coming back
to this – the important thing is we keep the economic reform programme going.
Sure, we have done better than most of the world over the last eight years but
we have got to keep the economic reform programme going. We need more reform
in relation to industrial relations, we need more reform in relation to competition,
we need more reform in relation to infrastructure, and we are determined to
do that.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible) what is your position on the possible reform of Australia’s
tax system? There has been calls from various (inaudible)?
TREASURER:
Well look, we have done an enormous amount in relation to tax. We have cut
the company tax rate, we have halved capital gains tax, we have abolished financial
institutions duty, we will abolish bank account debits tax. We have introduced
merger relief and rollover relief. We have legislated for an increase in the
top tax threshold. We are going to introduce tax reductions for mature aged
workers. We are reducing the superannuation surcharge. This is a more ambitious
tax agenda than you have ever seen in Australia. Does it mean however that everything
is perfect? No of course you have got to continue to work at these things. You
have got to continue to work at keeping your tax system competitive. But we
have a very, very aggressive agenda going at the moment.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible) talking to the Prime Minister in a couple of days time (inaudible)
major tax reform package (inaudible)?
TREASURER:
Well I think what we are going to do in tax is now pretty well known, that
on 1 July we are going to raise the threshold for the top marginal tax rates.
We have legislated it. We are also going to reduce tax for mature aged workers.
We are also going to reduce tax for parents who incur childcare. Now all of
these things are coming into effect. They are really big substantive tax reductions.
Billions and billions of dollars.
JOURNALIST:
On Telstra can you say when you will release the name of the successful bidders
for the scoping study for the full privatisation?
TREASURER:
Sorry I can’t, I don’t know.
JOURNALIST:
The G-7 has called for the western countries to reduce poverty in the world.
Is Australia doing enough in that area I mean, we are giving ourselves tax cuts,
are we doing anything for the people in our region who can’t feed themselves?
TREASURER:
Well we are doing many things. The first thing I would remind you of is that
Australia announced a $1 billion package for the Tsunami affected victims in
the Indian Ocean. That was the largest contribution of any Government. The Australian
public opened their hearts and their wallets with extreme generosity. The Australian
Government has already moved to forgive debt for heavily indebted countries
such as Nicaragua and Ethiopia. So we are making a contribution. You can only
make a contribution if you have got a strong economy. We have to keep our economy
strong. But if we do keep it strong, we can make a contribution.
JOURNALIST:
But that’s a one-off the Tsunami. Can we give them a billion dollars
a year to reduce poverty?
TREASURER:
Well the Tsunami is a billion dollars over five years. The Australian aid contribution
that we give on an annual basis is more than $2 billion per annum. So the Tsunami
aid is in addition to the annual aid.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
Well look, I think we should keep our economy strong and if we keep our economy
strong, we can help people in our region and beyond. We are quite focussed on
that.
JOURNALIST:
Is there any way the Federal Government would commit $200 million to this canal
without a feasibility study?
TREASURER:
Well if there is a change of government, if the National Water Initiative is
signed, then the Western Australian Gallop Government is eligible for money.
They have to put in an application and of course the Commonwealth has to ensure
that its procedures are met.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
Because, you know, we…
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
Well a project of this scale would be very eligible. Absolutely. Under a National
Water Initiative to ensure that Australia’s water resources are properly
utilised and properly worked then a project of this scale would be very, very
eligible.
JOURNALIST:
Mr Barnett is talking about proceeding with his plan without doing a feasibility
study.
TREASURER:
Well how the Western Australian Government goes about it is a matter for the
Western Australia Government. But what I am saying is this, if the National
Water Initiative is signed by Western Australia the Western Australia Government
becomes eligible for Federal assistance.
JOURNALIST:
But there is no guarantee?
TREASURER:
Well you have got to apply. You know, you don’t just get written a cheque.
You have got to actually sign the agreement and you have got to apply. But there
is a guarantee of Federal funds for anyone who signs the National Water Initiative.
There is a guarantee. And until you, and until such time as you sign the National
Water Initiative there is a guarantee that you will receive no Federal funds.
That is (inaudible) conversely that there is a guarantee and you have got to
make your applications.
JOURNALIST:
But you don’t have to do a feasibility study to sign up (inaudible)?
TREASURER:
You have got to make an application, you have got to set out what the project
is, you have got to illustrate the nature of the Commonwealth assistance, you
have got to go through all of those things. But you won’t get money until
you have made an application. Absolutely right.
JOURNALIST:
So has Mr Barnett has made this commitment without some guarantee of financial
support from the Federal Government which he says (inaudible)?
TREASURER:
Well I think he has said that if he is elected that he will sign the National
Water Initiative. If he signs the National Water Initiative, Western Australia
becomes eligible for Federal funding. And he will apply for that Federal funding.
So I think he can say that, absolutely.
JOURNALIST:
What do you think about the canal proposal?
TREASURER:
Well, I haven’t studied all of the details of it but if it is a good
project it should be done.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
If it is a good project, it should be done.
JOURNALIST:
Is it a good project?
TREASURER:
Well it sounds like a good project to me.
JOURNALIST:
But could the Federal Government commit…
TREASURER:
Come on, last question.
JOURNALIST:
Could it commit though, hundreds of millions of dollars that is what you are
talking about if it has not been properly costed or looked into on a social
or environmental impact?
TREASURER:
Well there is a precondition here. It can’t commit any money because
Western Australia won’t sign the National Water Initiative.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
Well hang on, it will only sign it if there is a change of government. So if
there is a change of government, if it signs the National Water Initiative,
then it will get Federal funding, then it will apply, and then it will be eligible.
But there is only one way that Western Australia ever becomes eligible for funding
under the National Water Initiative. And it is under a change of government
I am afraid. And I can’t tell you what is going to happen on February
26th maybe you should tell me. Thanks very much.