Uranium, oil, tax reform, Budget, IR reform, McGauchie – Interview with Paul Murray, 6PR
November 22, 2005Simplification of tax law, budget surplus, tax cuts, James Hardie, Singapore Airlines, Victorian Liberal Party – Press Conference, Treasury Place, Melbourne
November 24, 2005Doorstop Interview
Australian Opera Studio
Midland
Wednesday, 23 November 2005
10.15 am (Perth Time)
SUBJECTS: IR legislation, US economy
JOURNALIST:
Can I first of all ask you, should the Government accept the Senate Committee’s
recommendations and amendments to the IR legislation?
TREASURER:
I think the recommendations that the Committee have put forward are well worth
considering and I imagine that the Government will accept many of them. Where
there are improvements that can be made, of course we are open to making improvements
but the essence of the policy, of course, has been set. It is to encourage negotiations;
to give more flexibility in the workforce; to strengthen the economy. And the
basic thrust won’t be changing but where improvements can be made I am
sure the Government will look at those very carefully.
JOURNALIST:
(inaudible) penalty rates on Christmas Day for example, is that something the
Government will seriously consider?
TREASURER:
Look, we believe that people should have a system where they can work productively,
where they get proper reward for effort. I think you will find that most people,
and there aren’t many of them, but most people who work on Christmas Day
do get substantially more for doing so and that is obviously going to continue
to be the case otherwise you won’t get people that are prepared to work
on Christmas Day.
JOURNALIST:
Is it a breach of privacy for the Committee Chair to consult the Minister and
his Department about the Report’s content before it is tabled?
TREASURER:
Well, this is a matter for parliamentary procedure and privileges and if anyone
has a complaint they can make it. But at the end of the day, does much turn
on it? No.
JOURNALIST:
But do you think…
TREASURER:
(inaudible)
JOURNALIST:
…that it is a breach of privacy though? I mean…
TREASURER:
It is not privacy. It is alleged sometimes that if you disclose the contents
of a Committee Report before it is made public that this is not giving proper
disclosure at the proper time. If anyone has a complaint about that they can
make it to the Parliament. But let me make the point, does anything turn on
it? Did it mean that anybody’s rights were prejudiced in any way? No,
I don’t think so. I just think it is a debating point from the Labor Party.
JOURNALIST:
Is the Government going to have to give some ground somewhere along the line
to get this through?
TREASURER:
Well, the Government will look at the recommendations of the Senate Committee
and where improvements can be made, will make them. Now, these may be at the
margin, these may be by way of clarification. But they won’t change the
overall policy.
JOURNALIST:
Just on leadership, the transition deadline that your supporters have set for
that changeover, does that still stand for March/April of next year?
TREASURER:
I have said all that I am going to say on that issue. I won’t be adding
to it.
JOURNALIST:
But in terms of the deadline though, is that still the expectation that your
supporters have?
TREASURER:
Well you keep throwing assumptions in your questions, and as I say, I am not
going to be baited by them.
JOURNALIST:
If they are assumptions though where does the matter stand then? I am happy
to be corrected on that.
TREASURER:
No, I am not in the business of correcting questions. I am in the business
of giving answers.
JOURNALIST:
Are you reassessing your intention to challenge for the leadership in the new
year?
TREASURER:
Same answer.
JOURNALIST:
Have you told the Prime Minister that this deadline does still stand?
TREASURER:
Same answer.
JOURNALIST:
Which is…
TREASURER:
You’re from the ABC.
JOURNALIST:
That’s right. Will you be disappointed if Mr Howard looks to stay on
longer than next year?
TREASURER:
Have we got any serious questions?
JOURNALIST:
Look, I will change the subject completely. How concerned are you about the
possible slow-down in the US and what impact it will have in Australia?
TREASURER:
The US economy is the largest economy in the world. It governs global production
and it is important for the global economy that the US continue to grow, and
if the US should weaken then the global economy will weaken. Fortunately, Australia
has been able to shrug off US economic weakness in the past and I believe we
can do it in the future. But it is easier to run a strong Australian economy
on a strong global economy than to run a strong Australian economy in a weak
global economy. So we would like to see the US strong, we would like to see
global growth strong.
JOURNALIST:
Treasurer, just back to the other question I asked before, if someone does…
TREASURER:
All right, last question.
JOURNALIST:
…make a complaint, will you take any action in regards to the Senate
Committee Chair disclosing information?
TREASURER:
No. If the Labor Party wants to make a complaint, they make it, as I understand
it, to the Senate. They don’t make it to the Treasurer or to the Government,
they make it to the Senate. They are free to make any complaint they like. But
does anything turn on this? Here is the Report. Everybody knows what it is in
it. If you find out what is it in it an hour before or an hour after does anything
turn on it? Nothing. It is a debating point, they can make it, but as I say,
I think there are more important things in the world today. Okay. Thanks.