A More Flexible and Adaptable Retirement Income System
February 25, 2004National Accounts December Quarter 2003; Distribution of GST Revenue; Mark Latham’s Economic Policies; Personal Tax Rates, Sugar Industry Assistance – Press Conference, Parliament House, Canberra
March 3, 2004TRANSCRIPT
THE HON PETER COSTELLO MP
Treasurer
Interview with Sally Loane
ABC, 702
Thursday, 26 February 2004
9.05 am
SUBJECTS: Superannuation Changes; Australia’s Demographic Challenges;
Taxation; Mark Latham; Wentworth Pre-Selection.
LOANE:
The Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello, joins me. Mr Costello good morning
and welcome.
TREASURER:
Good morning Sally. Great to be with you.
LOANE:
Yeah. Good to have your company this morning. A lot of people want to talk
about this. There’s a great deal of interest. Obviously things were too
inflexible. You had to introduce some flexibility and a bit of incentive. Some
people have said though, you haven’t gone far enough, you haven’t
given any tax incentives.
TREASURER:
Well, you can always be accused of not doing enough. And people can always
say, you know, you have run a mile, why don’t you run two? Of course,
I accept that. But I think the big issue here and this is the issue I want to
focus people’s minds on, is, that the nature of our society is changing.
We have a lower birth-rate and we are living longer. And in forty years time
one in four Australians is going to be over 65. Today there are five people
in the workforce to support each person over 55, in forty years time there are
going to be two and a half. So they are going to have the carry the burden not
only of their own services but of supporting this ageing population. And it
is going to change the nature of our society. Now the changes are in the can.
They are in the can because our birth rates changed thirty years ago. They are
in the can because medical technology changed. And this is a looming problem
which I say we have got to start addressing now, not with panic measures, but
with sensible policy so that we can adjust to this change over ten, twenty,
thirty and forty years. And that is the conversation that I want to have with
people about how we are going to face up to this issue.
LOANE:
You have got to change the culture in a lot of work places too where people
are still seen if they are forty five or over they are over the hill.
TREASURER:
Absolutely. Yeah…take the banking industry. The banks started closing
down their branches and were putting off bank managers in their 40s, some of
whom have never worked again. And you can’t retire in your 40s, you can’t
retire in your 50s. My message is, if you retire at 55, you are going to have
trouble supporting your retirement because life expectancy is now 82. It is
going to rise to 85. If you retire at 55 that is 30 years in retirement. For
some people, if they have done higher education, they only get into the workforce
at 25, if they are going to work for 30 years and then retire for 30 years,
how are they going to manage? So, we have to change the attitude of employers,
we have to change the attitude of people themselves and we have to face up to
this problem. Now, it is not an insurmountable problem, it is a problem which
every developed country is going through, all of the so-called “rich countries”
of the world, and we are probably as well placed as many. But the earlier we
start on this issue the better we will adjust to it.
LOANE:
Do you think there are many people though, do you know many people in your
circle of friends if you like, who want to retire at 55 or even 65? Don’t
you think people’s attitudes to work have really, really have changed?
TREASURER:
I think they are changing. The superannuation preservation age is 55. And I
think a lot of people, perhaps not so much today, maybe five years ago said,
well I am 55 I will take my superannuation and I will retire. And it is funny
as I talk around these issues so many people come forward and say, yes, I retired
at 55, I got totally bored, I have come back into the workforce. Now, they may
not want to come back into the workforce and work 40 hours a week on the same
duties that they were doing before. They may want to come back and work two
days a week. Or they may want to work for a couple of months and then take a
caravan up the coast for a couple of months. So I think the nature of work for
these people will change. It will be a lot more part time work.
LOANE:
And they will be able to access their super?
TREASURER:
And what we are saying is…
LOANE:
(inaudible)
TREASURER:
…we will change the law so that they can supplement their income with
their super if that will encourage them back into the work force. Now that will
be good for them because they will get a bit more income but also it will be
good for society and the economy as a whole because we will be utilising all
the skills of the older workers.
LOANE:
I know 55 year olds that are starting on their second families. I mean they
have got no prospect of retiring. It will be 20 years before…
TREASURER:
Well, they are doing something for society. They are boosting the fertility
rate.
LOANE:
That’s another question isn’t it? Have you thought about some
policies to do that?
TREASURER:
Well, it is an interesting thing. And I have been very interested, fascinated
by some of the work that has been done in this area. It seems to be a phenomena
right around the world that in the developed countries, the rich countries of
the world, Europe, Japan, North America, Australia, the fertility rates have
fallen. It is not an Australian thing, it is happening in France and Germany
and Italy and Japan and America and Canada and New Zealand and Britain and of
course where fertility rates are high is in the developing world. Now, we have
got a lot of ideas as to why that might be the case but that seems to be a given.
As a society gets more affluent…
LOANE:
And more educated.
TREASURER:
…and more educated, I think education is a big part of it too, then the
number of births per family tends to get lower.
LOANE:
I can see a lot of questions coming through on the board already. We have
got a full board already Treasurer, so if you would like to put your headphones
on. A lot of them are going to ask you about tax, tax on savings.
Can I ask you firstly though, before we get to calls, the whole issue about
still taxing super, surely you have looked at that? Surely that would be a terrific
incentive to people if you reduced tax on super?
TREASURER:
Yes, we have been working on that. We have been working on reducing the super
surcharge. We had a policy at the last election and unfortunately the Senate
defeated it but we got some measures through. And we are also working on encouraging
co-contributions which I think will be another avenue here. But, at the moment,
we are not putting forward a tax policy. What I want to put forward is something
much bigger than a tax policy. I want to put forward an issue which is going
to change the nature of our society. As I said yesterday, demographic change
is slow, but demography is destiny. When it arrives it changes the nature of
your society. And it is not just in the retirement area that we have got to
think about this but we have got to think about it in all sorts of other areas
as well because it will affect our health system, our pharmaceutical system,
our aged care system, our economic system, our industrial relations system and
just about every other area of policy.
LOANE:
You said you are not releasing any tax policy yet, well is that something that
we can look forward to in, later on in the year around the Budget?
TREASURER:
Well, we are coming up to a Budget…
LOANE:
Something recrafted?
TREASURER:
…and in a Budget we will be looking at all areas of expenses and revenues.
LOANE:
Some tax changes there?
TREASURER:
Well, I am not ruling things in or out but we are coming up to a Budget and
my attitude is, and I have laid down this principle before, if a Government
can pay for defence and security and health care and pharmaceuticals and aged
pensions and balance its Budget, then our philosophy is you should try and reduce
taxes.
LOANE:
Mmm, because a lot of Australians, I mean The Australian newspapers tax series
has just pointed out very starkly to anybody who was still in doubt that we
still are very highly taxed. Our high, certainly our top marginal tax income
rate is higher, it kicks in at a lower income level than a lot of other developing
countries.
A lot of people are just crying out for some sort of tax reform, particularly
post GST.
TREASURER:
Well, two points, one point I agree with and one I don’t. I do agree
that our top marginal tax rate cuts in at a low threshold. It cuts in at $62,500
and I tried to lift it to $75,000 and the Opposition defeated that. So I do
agree with that point. On international comparisons of the developed countries,
Australia tends towards the lower taxed overall of the developed countries.
Our tax burden is less than it is in Europe for example Canada, some of these
other countries. Now they take a lot more weight on their indirect tax system
than we do in Australia. We take more weight on our direct, our income tax system.
Some of those other countries have GSTs or VATs at 17 or 18 per cent, as you
know, so they take more weight on their indirect. And most of those countries
have death duties. Australia doesn’t have any death duties. The United
States has death duties. So we tend to take more of the weight on our direct
tax system but overall it is, we are probably in the lower third of the OECD.
LOANE:
It is seventeen past nine. I am with the Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello.
Let’s take a couple of calls. I know a lot of callers want to ask you
about taxation rates, particularly on savings. Alan good morning.
CALLER:
Good morning Sally. Good morning Treasurer.
TREASURER:
Good morning Alan.
CALLER:
I retired from the workforce in July last year after working for 52 years and
paid a lot of my own superannuation and my company paid part of it. One of the
things I want to ask you is why doesn’t the Government give a tax break
on savings on interest earned?
TREASURER:
Well…
CALLER:
That is an incentive we could all do with.
TREASURER:
Sure. The way the income tax system works is that it taxes income and income
includes interest. One of the ways in which superannuation is encouraged of
course is if you put money into superannuation the interest that is earned in
a super fund is taxed at a 15 per cent rate which is a much lower rate than
the income tax rate. That is one of the areas where superannuation is more concesssional
than general income. But…
CALLER:
But you still have to some money set aside that you look at, try and save,
and put a little bit away for things on the side and I think that an incentive
as a retiree that you should look at. Because after all we have already paid
tax on it and now we’re retired and now we are being taxed again on it.
TREASURER:
Sure, well these are all areas that I think Governments have got to work at
keeping taxes as low as possible and to do that we have got to keep expenditures
as low as possible. And I think it behoves us all to do as well as we can in
these areas. And I can assure you we will be.
LOANE:
Margaret good morning.
CALLER:
Oh, good morning Sally, good morning Treasurer.
TREASURER:
Good morning Margaret.
CALLER:
My comment is that I think in some ways the forty years is short-sighted and
it is not taking into account our poor adult children who would like to live
in certain suburbs but already those suburbs their houses are close to a million
dollars. Now these people will be trying to pay a mortgage and they may not
be able to retire but I don’t know that they are going to bother about
trying to fund other peoples retirement.
TREASURER:
Well, that is…
CALLER:
A lot of young people have quite a strong resentment about the fact that now
housing, simple housing, is really quite unaffordable.
TREASURER:
Well, I think this is a good point. The younger people are not only going to
have to pay for themselves but they will be called upon to pay for an ageing
society. And as I said earlier, whereas we have got five people in the workforce
to support those over 65 today, that will decline to 2 and simple arithmetic
says if you have got half the number of taxpayers supporting the retirees, that
could be double the cost for them unless we start making some kind of provision
for this now. And that is why we have to contain costs as far as possible and
encourage people to make self-provision, stay in the workforce longer, make
a part time contribution in their 60s whereas they might have previously retired.
This is a big part of the ageing of the population.
It is not just the ageing of the population either. The other big factor that
is changing our society is technological improvement. That we are now getting
access to drugs which can cure conditions which previously were incurable. And
the public wants access to these drugs and these treatments and you can get
if you are a pensioner, access to pharmaceuticals at the concessional price
of $3.70. Sometimes these treatments cost $3,000. And there is more of them
coming on to the market all the time. And you have got to have a way of sustaining
this.
LOANE:
So, in every workplace out there, all the young people should be encouraging
the oldies to stay?
TREASURER:
Yes.
LOANE:
If they hear of somebody retiring, they say, no, we need you.
TREASURER:
We need you in the workforce.
LOANE:
(inaudible) to push them all out of the workforce.
TREASURER:
We need you in the workforce. Stay here. You don’t have to work full
time but do two days a week and you can have a top up with your superannuation
and that will make life easier for me as well. That is the way you have got
to think about this.
LOANE:
We have got a couple of questions Treasurer about people in, particularly in
trades and manual jobs, John, you want to know about this don’t you?
CALLER:
Yeah, g’day Peter.
TREASURER:
Yes, how are you?
CALLER:
Oh, I am fine. I was listening to the discussion yesterday and today and it
struck me because I come from an agricultural background, if you are going to
have a blanket rule of keeping people on instead of letting them go at 57, if
I am a shearer, you know, I kick off at 17, at 57 I will tell you what, I am
starting to look forward to a bit of retirement.
TREASURER:
You want to rest your back I suppose do you?
CALLER:
Well that’s right. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
TREASURER:
Well, that’s fair enough. And understand that, in manual jobs, physical,
where physical exertion is required like it obviously is in shearing it is going
to be much harder. But I think what we have then got to think about is maybe
different opportunities. I don’t know in the shearing shed if there are
other jobs that could be done or there might be other jobs done where you could
be on a tractor or something like that. I understand the point about physical
exertion and you can’t keep doing that into your late 50s and your early
60s but we have got to think about other opportunities.
LOANE:
I know a shearer who opened a coffee shop in his local town. He didn’t
like the standing up though, the long hours, I don’t mean to be flippant
but what a lot of people are doing, and what we find here with our audience
is that a lot of people maybe leave one job and go into another job, start their
own businesses, things like that.
TREASURER:
Well part time work, maybe drive a hire car, something like that, a lot of
people do. A caretaker down at the local school, you know, looking after the
property and that kind of thing. It is lighter duties, you come across a lot
of people that are doing that. And I think you will see more of it actually
in our society. I have noticed this in countries which have a bigger ageing
population than us, it is quite common to see much older people in the workforce.
LOANE:
Still doing lots of different things.
TREASURER:
Yes.
LOANE:
Rhonda?
CALLER:
Yes.
LOANE:
Good morning.
CALLER:
I am trying to find out how we are going to keep these, this part time employment
going when employers don’t want it?
TREASURER:
I think this is the biggest problem. The attitude of employers…
LOANE:
Can you have a stick for employers?
TREASURER:
…well, you know, I am sort of out there rattling the drum. And I am saying
to employers, particularly big companies, I think it is a bit different in small
companies, but big companies. Look, you do have the opportunity to keep these
people on. They have skills, they are very reliable, the one thing about an
older person in the workforce is they tend to be very reliable. We know this,
they don’t have as many sick days and have big nights out. They turn up
on time, they have that work ethic. They are very reliable. And maybe they are
not in a full time high pressure job but they can be there assisting somebody
else or taking the overload work or something like that. And I think we do have
to re-educate our employers, this idea that you are going to throw people on
the scrap heap at 40 or 50, and there was a lot of that going on in the 70s…
LOANE:
Sure was. Yeah and 80s.
TREASURER:
…and 80s. That is wrong. Those days are over. I guess my message is this.
There is going to be no such thing as full time retirement. There is going to
be part time retirement and part time work. And the other thing I would say
about it as I talk around the community, so many people say to me, well I tried
full time retirement and it nearly killed me. Or wives say, he came home after
30 years and I couldn’t stand him in the house all day. You know, get
him back in the workforce.
LOANE:
It is twenty five past nine. I am with the Treasurer, Peter Costello, who is
on the road today selling some of these ideas and changes. I just wanted to
ask you about Mark Latham Treasurer, how is his honeymoon going? Still going
strong?
TREASURER:
Oh it is going pretty well. I think he is getting a good run from the press
and they are giving him a good go.
LOANE:
Are they being soft on him?
TREASURER:
Oh, look a new person comes along and they get interested and they give him
a go. And he has had a long go.
LOANE:
Too long?
TREASURER:
But you and I know that after the honeymoon the hard business of marriage begins
and he is going to have to pick up on policy. That is where he is weak.
LOANE:
Would you like to be there going head-to-head with him? I know…
TREASURER:
Well I went head-to-head with him…
LOANE:
…you do in Parliament.
TREASURER:
…no I went head-to-head with him for seven months when he was Shadow
Treasurer. And the thing I learnt about him was he didn’t have an economic
policy. He is one of these people, I think he gets on the internet, he gets
an idea and he says listen to this. And then the next day he gets on the internet,
he has got another idea listen to this.
LOANE:
But they are listening aren’t they. A lot of people are listening.
TREASURER:
Sure. But…
LOANE:
Especially the stuff about boys and…
TREASURER:
…after a while you say, well hang on, what you said on Monday is quite
different to what you said on Wednesday and if he ever got into Government he
would have to make all this add up. And you can’t govern a nation by Google,
by a search engine.
LOANE:
Can I ask you, you are going to have either Malcolm Turnbull or Peter King
side by side with you? The preselection is this Saturday for that seat of Wentworth.
Are you backing any one candidate?
TREASURER:
No, I am not engaged in it. I am not lobbying delegates or anything like that.
Peter King asked me for a reference which I was happy to provide because he
has been a valued colleague.
LOANE:
So he has got your reference and the Prime Minister’s reference. That
would push him over the edge wouldn’t it? In terms of preselection?
TREASURER:
You know the funny thing about Liberal Party delegates is they are very independently
minded. They make up their own minds and not like Labor Party factions. You
can’t tell a Liberal how to vote in a ballot. You know, they exercise
that privilege quite carefully. So, as the delegates will decide it. I am not
lobbying delegates one way or the other. But Peter is a colleague and he asked
for a reference and I was happy to give it because he has been a valued colleague.
LOANE:
So, you would miss him if he was beaten by Malcolm Turnbull?
TREASURER:
I think he has got a great contribution to make. I think Malcolm has got a
great contribution to make. It is a pity that there weren’t two seats
available.
LOANE:
So Malcolm Turnbull shouldn’t have gone into a seat…
TREASURER:
Well I think they have both got contributions to make.
LOANE:
…held by Peter King?
TREASURER:
And I don’t think we are so overflowing with talent that we don’t
have opportunities elsewhere.
LOANE:
Peter Costello, just finally, the Prime Minister John Howard is 64 as we know,
retirement age, pension age next year, would you like to see the Prime Minister
going into his 70s like you are encouraging all the other workers in Australia?
TREASURER:
Well, you know, I am encouraging people whilst they have contributions to make
to continue to do it. And that applies to you, me, everybody Sally. But in politics
as you know, the voters decide that at the end of the day. They decide whether
or not to compulsorily retire you.
LOANE:
Peter Costello thanks for your time.
TREASURER:
Thanks very much.