AAA Again For Australia
February 17, 2003Australian economy; Defence spending; Iraq; Qantas-Air New Zealand; Triangular Tax
February 20, 2003NO.007
TRANS-TASMAN TAX BREAK-THROUGH
The Australian and New Zealand governments announced today that a new
tax arrangement which could boost trans-Tasman investment will come into force
soon.
“Both countries expect to introduce legislation in May to relieve the
double taxation of certain investments in Australian and New Zealand companies
that operate in both countries,” said Australian Treasurer Peter Costello
and New Zealand Finance and Revenue Minister Michael Cullen.
“These long awaited reforms reflect the commitment of both governments
to the continued strengthening of the Closer Economic Relations agreement between
Australia and New Zealand and to promoting trans-Tasman business,” Mr Costello
and Dr Cullen said.
“The reforms are aimed at what is known as the `triangular tax’ problem,
where Australian and New Zealand shareholders investing through a company
resident in the other country that earns income and pays taxes in their own
jurisdiction are unable to get imputation credits arising from the payment of
such taxes.”
“To resolve this problem, Australia and New Zealand will extend their
imputation systems to include companies resident in the other country.”
“Under this reform, Australian and New Zealand shareholders of trans-Tasman
companies that choose to take up these reforms will be allocated imputation
credits, representing New Zealand tax paid, and franking credits, representing
Australian tax paid, in proportion to their ownership of the company. However,
each country’s credits will be able to be claimed only by its residents.”
“These changes will remove an impediment to trans-Tasman business. Therefore
we are especially pleased to be able to announce them in this year of the twentieth
anniversary of the signing of CER,” Mr Costello and Dr Cullen said.
The expected date of effect of the new legislation is 1 April 2003
for New Zealand companies maintaining a franking account and Australian
companies maintaining an imputation credit account, although franked or imputed
dividends cannot be paid out until 1 October 2003.
For more information see Technical Appendix.
19 February 2003
Contact: Niki Savva
(02) 6277 7340
Technical Appendix
Details of trans-Tasman imputation (triangular) reform as
proposed by the Australian and New Zealand governments
General
New Zealand companies will be able to elect to maintain an Australian franking
account, subject to full compliance with the Australian provisions relating
to franking accounts.
Australian companies will be able to elect to maintain a New Zealand imputation
credit account, subject to full compliance with the New Zealand provisions
relating to imputation credit accounts.
Australian shareholders of New Zealand companies that have elected to
maintain a franking account and earn Australian income will be able to access
franking benefits on a pro rata basis (in proportion to their shareholding in
the New Zealand company) arising from the payment of Australian tax on
that income.
New Zealand shareholders of Australian companies that have elected to
maintain an imputation credit account and earn New Zealand income will
be able to access imputation benefits on a pro rata basis (in proportion to
their shareholding in the Australian company) arising from the payment of New Zealand
tax on that income.
Franking credits will arise in New Zealand companies’ franking accounts
for dividend, interest and royalty withholding taxes deducted in Australia.
They will arise in addition to credits for Australian income tax and franking
credits attached to dividends received.
Imputation credits will arise in Australian companies’ imputation credit accounts
for New Zealand taxes deducted from or paid by the Australian company.
Such taxes include non-resident withholding taxes on interest, royalties and
dividends and
non-resident contractors’ withholding tax.
The application date is 1 April 2003 for New Zealand companies maintaining
Australian franking accounts and Australian companies maintaining New Zealand
imputation credit accounts. Companies will not be able to distribute the credits
until 1 October 2003.
The Australian exempting company rules
The `look-through’ approach that currently applies in relation to Australian
companies under the Australian exempting company rules will be extended to include
New Zealand companies so that they are `looked through’ to find the ultimate
effective owners. Companies that satisfy the extended rules will be able to
pass on the benefits of the reform to their Australian shareholders.
The exempting company rules will also be amended to:
- give Australian resident shareholders in a New Zealand listed company
that is an exempting company franking benefits for franking credits attached
to dividends paid by the entity; and
- allow the 100 per cent owned Australian subsidiary of a New Zealand
listed company that fails the amended exempting company rules to nevertheless
pass franking credits to its parent.
Existing credits
Franking credits accumulated by an Australian subsidiary of a New Zealand
company before 1 April 2003 will be available to frank distributions if the
subsidiary would not have been treated as an exempting company under the proposed
changes, had they applied before that date.
A company that is an exempting company immediately before 1 April 2003 will
have access to franking credits accumulated before that date, provided that,
during the period 13 May 1997 (when the exempting company rules came
into effect) to 1 April 2003, either:
- effective Australian ownership of the company, determined using the look-through
approach, was always greater than 5 per cent; or
- the company was a 100 per cent owned subsidiary of a New Zealand listed
company.
Imputation credits accumulated by a New Zealand subsidiary of an Australian
company before 1 April 2003 will be available to impute distributions
made by Australian companies after 1 October 2003.
In Australia, all companies in a wholly owned trans-Tasman group will be jointly
and severally liable for the payment of additional tax and penalties when a
New Zealand company runs its Australian franking account into deficit and
defaults on the franking deficit tax payable.
In New Zealand, all companies in a wholly owned trans-Tasman group will
be jointly and severally liable for the payment of further income tax, penalties,
and interest when an Australian company has a debit balance in its New Zealand
imputation credit account at the end of the imputation year and defaults on
these liabilities.
In both countries, sectors such as banking, funds management and insurance,
where regulations prohibit such entities from assuming the liabilities of others
in the group, will be excluded from the joint and several liability.
Reducing the franking rebate for Australian shareholders
The franking rebate received by an Australian shareholder of a New Zealand
company who is eligible to receive credits for foreign tax (for example, an
investor with less than a 10 per cent shareholding) will be reduced to the extent
of the supplementary dividend paid by the New Zealand company.
Trans-Tasman group structures
Both countries will generally allow Australian and New Zealand group structures,
regardless of the percentage of ownership, to pass credits through to their
underlying shareholders.
Trans-Tasman group structures involving a third country/Consolidation
for imputation purposes only
In Australia, wholly owned trans-Tasman groups involving an entity not resident
in Australia or New Zealand will be able to pass through franking credits
to the Australian shareholders of a New Zealand company.
New Zealand will allow a consolidation election for imputation purposes, based
on the existing consolidation provisions. Such an election will also be available
to Australian companies within wholly owned trans-Tasman groups.
Commissioner’s discretion
The Commissioner of Taxation in Australia will be given discretion to revoke
an election to maintain an Australian franking account in certain circumstances
where a New Zealand company does not comply with Australia’s imputation
rules. The Commissioner of Inland Revenue in New Zealand will be given
a similar discretion.
Further details
Further issues may arise in the development of the legislation and will be
dealt with at that time.