Budget; Telstra; Australian Solar Timbers – Interview with Graham Robinson, ABC Radio
May 22, 2002United Medical Protection; ABC
May 24, 2002TRANSCRIPT
of
HON. PETER COSTELLO MP
Treasurer
Doorstop Interview
Thursday, 23 May 2002
12.35 pm
Adelaide
SUBJECTS: Telstra, Coalition
TREASURER:
The Labor Party has released its policy on Telstra today and it makes very
interesting reading. The first thing that they say is that “the status
quo is insufficient”, “the status quo is insufficient”. The Labor
Party agrees with what I have been saying now for quite some time, that you
can not have a Telstra which is half pregnant, which is 50.1 per cent Government
owned and 49.9 per cent private owned. It has got to be one or the other, you
have either got to nationalise it and have a Government owned telecommunications
company, or a privately owned one. And the interesting thing is, although the
Labor Party has been pretending up until now that you could keep Telstra the
way it is, Mr Tanner says “the status quo is insufficient”. Now, what
he proposes to do is to asset strip Telstra. And if I were one of the 2 million
shareholders that have shares in Telstra today I would be very, very concerned
about what the Labor Party is planning. Telstra shareholders bought shares in
a full service company and the Labor Party says that if they get elected they
will have an asset strip operation so that whatever your shares were in, after
the Labor Party finishes with it, it could be a very, very different operation.
But the one thing that the Labor Party agrees with us on, is, that the current
arrangements are insufficient, you have got to go one way or the other. Only
the Government has a clear idea of where to go in relation to this, which is,
to fix regional services, bring standards up to par in the bush and to offer
additional shareholding to the Australian public.
JOURNALIST:
And wouldn’t that be easier to achieve if it was actually one conservative
party, a merged Liberal and National Party?
TREASURER:
Well, in order to do that you have got to get the vote through the Senate and
it would only be easy to achieve if the Labor Party gives up the pretence that
the current arrangements are maintainable. Now, Lindsay Tanner has belled the
cat. He says it’s insufficient, the current arrangements are insufficient. So,
so Mr Crean ought to give away the pretence. He has been trying to maintain
this pretence that Telstra can stay half pregnant. It can’t. Lindsay Tanner
says it can’t, give away the pretence, support the Government.
JOURNALIST:
What assets do you think they might be referring to?
TREASURER:
Well, what they say, they are going to strip out the mobile phone business
out of Telstra. They can strip out some of the television businesses out of
Telstra. And if you bought a share in Telstra as a full service business, you
bought a share in those businesses as well. Now they are going to strip them
out from underneath 2 million Australian shareholders. So, for 2 million Australian
shareholders better hope that the Labor Party never gets elected in this country.
JOURNALIST:
What are your thoughts on Mr Minchin’s idea of a merger?
TREASURER:
Well, the statements that were made were not representing the Prime Minister’s
view, and I think Senator Minchin has acknowledged that. And I do not think
this is something that should be discussed in public forums. If people have
views they should be discussed between the members of the two Parties. And I
would urge that it be kept within the forums of the Parties rather than brought
out for fully fledged public discussions.
JOURNALIST:
Is it an issue that you have a strong view on?
TREASURER:
It is not a view, no, it is not an issue that I have a strong view on. My view
is that this is a matter for the National Party, in particular, to consider
and I would not advise the National Party on it. It is up to the National Party
and its leadership. It is a matter for them and I certainly won’t be trying
to direct them in any way whatsoever on the issue.
JOURNALIST:
Was Senator Minchin ill-advised to raise this?
TREASURER:
Well, put it this way, he did not actually raise it when he gave his speech
because he acknowledged that this was not the proper forum. It is a free country,
people are entitled to their views, but I would just urge that if people have
views that they discuss it between members of the Liberal Party and the National
Party in private forums, rather than have a public debate.
JOURNALIST:
Would such a move drag the Nationals to the right, do you think?
TREASURER:
I don’t think the National Party would see itself as a left-wing political
operation. I don’t think it feels the need to be dragged to the right, and I
think it sees itself squarely in touch with conservative opinion.
JOURNALIST:
Was it a bit self-indulgent of Senator Minchin to bring it up under those circumstances,
out of the blue, without talking about it first with the Prime Minister?
TREASURER:
Well, I think this is something that if, if people want to discuss it, it should
be discussed with the leadership of the National Party in private forums, and
if the National Party is not interested, that’s it. I do not see any point in
having a, this (inaudible) large on the public stage. It is a matter for the
two Parties concerned.
Thanks.