ABN, gambling, Packer/Murdoch, FBT and charities, GST pricing
February 25, 2000Doorstop Interview, Chambers Flat, QLD: GST, Petrol, Economy
March 2, 2000
Transcript No. 2000/20 TRANSCRIPT OF The Hon Peter Costello MP TREASURER
Doorstop Monday, 28 February 2000 9.45 am
SUBJECT: GST/Woolworths, Reconciliation, compliance costs
JOURNALIST: Treasurer, good morning.
TREASURER: Good morning, how are you?
JOURNALIST: Does Woolworths admission that clothes will initially go up by a full 10 per cent damage your indication that that shouldnt be the case?
TREASURER: Well, I welcome the fact that Woolworths have today announced price changes as a result of GST, and they say that a basket of goods in their supermarket selling for $100 will sell for $100.80. So thats, what is that, 0.8 per cent change. This is the most definitive and authoritative survey which has yet been done by one of Australias major retailers. And they said, that in their price stores this is their figures, in Woolworths price stores, if youre paying $100 in a supermarket today, they think under GST youll be paying $100.80, with the possibility of further price falls when transport cost reductions are factored in. Now that is, of course, the most definitive and authoritative statement yet from an actual retailer as to what that retailer intends to charge post 1 July. And what theyre talking about, is if youre paying $100 now, the bill could go to $100.80. A change of 80 cents in $100. Now, when you add in together, the fact that for a family with two children on a salary of say $40,000 theyll have additional spending power of $47 a week, that is, additional money in their pockets to spend of $47 a week extra, on a Woolworths price increase of 80 cents per $100, that is magnificent benefits for families and . . .
JOURNALIST: (inaudible) theyre still saying a full 10 per cent initially . . .
TREASURER: Well, well hang on. I think Labor now has egg all over their face. Absolute egg all over their face. I think, you know, for Mr Crean, goes out and starts attacking Woolworths today, I dont, I dont think Ive seen a politician less controlled than to, somebody to attack a major retailer. And why was he attacking a major retailer? Attacking a major retailer because the retailer had good news. $100 went to $100.80, thats good news. Now the Labor Party, of course, has pledged to keep GST. And lets ask the Labor Party this question are they going to give us a pledge today to take GST off clothes? Is that their pledge, have they said that? No, theyre just out there complaining about a tax that they intend to keep. And what theyre really worried about today is good news. $100 goes to $100.80, and thats not me talking, thats not the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission talking, thats Woolworths, Mr Corbett, whos done an extensive study, and he says, in his stores, if youre paying $100 today, youll pay $100.80 with the possibility of further price falls. And I welcome the fact that Woolworths has been so responsible in its announcement this morning.
JOURNALIST: The Opposition says, the Prime Minister and the Government has an attitude problem when it comes to Aboriginal reconciliation. Are you committed to reconciliation?
TREASURER: Yes, of course we are, and weve said that we will work hard on reconciliation.
JOURNALIST: Theres been a back down today . . .
TREASURER: Theres no question of an attitude . . .
JOURNALIST: . . . (inaudible).
TREASURER: There is no question of an attitude problem. The Government has been working hard on reconciliation and we hope that it will be accomplished.
JOURNALIST: But theres been no deadline set, or the deadlines now been broken.
TREASURER: Well, you ask me, does the Government have an attitude problem? The answer is no, the Government does not have an attitude problem. The Government is working on reconciliation and I hope it will come to a productive conclusion. Thanks.
JOURNALIST: Are business compliance costs for the GST going to be higher than originally forecast?
TREASURER: Well, look I saw all of these sort of discussions in the Financial Review which was based on Canada as far as I could tell, so I think the Fin will have to do a bit better tomorrow. Thanks. |