Queensland Government Hikes Taxes Whilst Receiving GST Windfall
January 22, 2004Labor’s $2.4 billion costings black hole; Telstra; superannuation surcharge; ALP Conference; Tax relief – Interview with Alexandra Kirk, AM, ABC
January 27, 2004TRANSCRIPT
THE HON PETER COSTELLO MP
Treasurer
Interview with John Miller and Ross Davies
4BC Radio
Friday, 23 January 2004
7.40 am (Queensland Time)
SUBJECTS: Queensland Election, National Australia Bank, Political Donation,
Australian Dollar, Schools, David Hookes, Interest Rates, First Home Buyers,
Defence Force Golf Courses
JOURNALIST:
Good morning and joining us here in the station is Mr Peter Costello.
TREASURER:
It’s great to be with you.
JOURNALIST:
Good to have you here.
TREASURER:
Good Morning Ross.
JOURNALIST:
You have obviously one purpose of the visit is too lend your support to the
Coalition in the lead-up to the up-coming snap State election, as they say.
You say Labor will lack accountability if it wins a third term?
TREASURER:
Well I have been focusing on economic management and one of the points that
we’ve been making is that the Queensland Government has got a $334 million
bonus from the GST this year.
JOURNALIST:
So it hasn’t been their sound economic management it’s coming from
Federal level?
TREASURER:
Well, $334 million over and above what they would have got under the old financial
arrangement and this has been the basis on which they’ve managed to balance
their budget. It comprises the whole of their cash surplus and my complaint
is this, having received this enormous bonus, $334 million, instead of cutting
taxes which you might have expected they’ve been raising them as well
and that’s not good management.
JOURNALIST:
All right, you must be though however, somewhat a little, shall we say disconcerted
by the apparent state of disarray within the Liberal Party in Queensland. I
mean I have been told that the Liberal Party headquarters is looking a lot like
the bridge of the Titanic, just before it hit the ice berg.
TREASURER:
Well I was down there yesterday and they looked, they didn’t look nearly
as luxurious as the bridge of the Titanic and I was out campaigning yesterday
with Bob Quinn and Sally Hannah who is the Liberal candidate in Clayfield. She
impressed me very much and so I think on the grounds…..
JOURNALIST:
She’s a very good local candidate…..
TREASURER:
She’s a good candidate and I went through shopping centres with her and
talked to some voters and I thought on the ground the campaign was going pretty
well but we’ll see on election day won’t we. They’re facing
a State Government which is entrenched and miles ahead in the polls and they’re
coming off a low base and that’s why I think their right to say it’s
important to restore a bit of the balance.
JOURNALIST:
Just about ten or fifteen minutes ago we were talking about the worsening problems
with the NAB. You have been outspoken about that in the past, it just seems
to get worse and worse doesn’t it?
TREASURER:
Well …
JOURNALIST:
…thirty somethings wondering around with buckets and buckets and buckets
of …
TREASURER:
Well we’ve got the prudential regulator APRA the Australian Prudential
Regulatory Authority which is looking at this from a prudential point of view,
that is how does it effect the bank’s asset base and capitalisation and
prudential. We have now heard over night that the securities in ASIC will be
looking at it from a disclosure point of view. That is were they disclosing
properly to the market and in addition to that of course you’ve the bank
looking at it from a point of view of “were these guys acting within their
responsibilities and were they being probably supervised” and I think
that’s going to be the critical question here. Because a trader normally
has limits and those limits are there so that people who are removed from it
can decide whether or not they’re getting to exposed and the question
is whether those limits were being observed.
JOURNALIST:
Mark Latham, back to politics for a moment, will announce next week that Labour
will not accept donations from tobacco company’s. Are you doing the same
thing?
TREASURER:
Well both parties have traditionally taken donations from business, including
companies like Phillip Morris that are partly tobacco companies partly do other
things as well…..
JOURNALIST:
…Vegemite for example…
TREASURER:
Vegemite, yes I think they do, do Vegemite. They’re diversifying into
food and we’re not influenced by the fact of course, that we take those
donations. But we have traditionally received them, we declare them, everybody
knows about them.
JOURNALIST:
$40,000 or so over the last couple of years…
TREASURER:
…absolutely, its on a public register if anybody thinks that this has
got them unfair treatment its all above board and its all out there. I will
make the point that the current government and presumably any government that
Mr Latham will be part of, if he were part of a government, isn’t too
proud to take the taxes from the tobacco companies. They do pay a lot of tax
on their product so, we’re not to proud to take taxes from them.
JOURNALIST:
Back to the question though, you would make it a policy that you would no longer
take donations from tobacco…
TREASURER:
…No, no we, we, we have taken them in the past and we have disclosed
it and as far as I am aware we not proposing to change that.
JOURNALIST:
Right, onto another subject again the Australian dollar, now if your going
overseas, great, but a major article in the Bulletin this week by Max Walsh
saying that the business community is getting very, very concerned about the,
the Aussie dollar which, I don’t know what it’s pushing today, but
heading up around the 80c mark.
TREASURER:
Well, the Australian dollar appreciated 40 per cent since the beginning of
2003, that’s in the last twelve months or so. It was the largest appreciation
of any currency in the world and you can remember the days when we were back
in the late 50’s at point we were even below 50c and as you now say we
up …
JOURNALIST:
…I know I went overseas at that time, its just great the Pacific peso
they were calling it.
TREASURER:
Well that’s the point you see. When tourists went overseas everything
was expensive. One of the consequences of that is fewer people went overseas,
you see and that was actually good for the economy. With the dollar stronger
now you’re going to get cheaper prices overseas, your dollar will go further
as it were, and more people might go overseas. So as it turns out in affecting
things like tourism or things we send overseas it does actually make it harder.
So it makes it harder for our exporters, our farmers, and I think this has been
a bit of a difficulty for them in the last couple of months and I acknowledge
that, but until you see a change of sentiment in relation to the United States
then the Greenback is weak and conversely the Australian dollar will be strong
again.
JOURNALIST:
…And there’s really…
TREASURER:
…consumers…
JOURNALIST:
…not much we can do about it is there?
TREASURER:
…no because a large part of it. Look part of it is the fact that people
have confidence in the Australian economy, that is one factor but an even bigger
factor in the movement of our currency over the last couple of years has been
the fact that the US dollar is weak. And when you see the Australian dollar
going up against the US dollar, part of the explanation is the US dollar is
going down. If your with me…
JOURNALIST:
Yes
TREASURER:
….there are two things that can move and if the US dollar moves down we move
up.
JOURNALIST:
The consumer benefits though, you can pick up a plasma screen TV at the moment
and electrical goods, for the consumer are way, way down in price.
TREASURER:
…Yes well imports are down see because our dollar buys cheaper, it makes
imported prices cheaper it buys more foreign currency so the consumer does benefits
from cheaper imports but from an economic point of view …
JOURNALIST:
…not good for Australia…
TREASURER:
…from an economic …more imports and less exports is not what we
want.
JOURNALIST:
…No, no
TREASURER:
…If you know what I mean and we prefer to have more exports and less imports
so the dollar does have that effect it does, it does, deliver some great benefits
to the consumer but from an economic point of view we would rather it be going
the other way.
JOURNALIST:
All right, in the interest of more dollars for our proprietors we might take
a short break, have a breather for a second and then be back with the Treasurer.
JOURNALIST:
Talking with Peter Costello of course. Mr Costello we had Jenny Macklin in
here last week and of course she has been hugely critical of the large amounts
of money going to elite schools and this week we have had both John Howard and
John Anderson attacking public schools. Is this a stance you share and why is
it that the elite schools do get so much money and there seems to be a lack
for public and independent schools?
TREASURER:
Well let me start off by saying obviously the Government schools are funded
by the tax payer a great deal more than independent schools. We got to start
off my making that point very, very clear. Those independent schools that do
receive Government funding receive them in categories with the richest or the
most elite receiving the least, they don’t all get the same amount. They
are put into categories and you know, the, the schools that have parents that
are from, this is the way its done, suburbs that have the highest incomes receive
the least. So even within the independent school formula, the elites are getting
a much smaller proportion than other independent schools. Now from a Government
point of view, can I make this point it actually pays to have both systems because
it is much cheaper for the Government, for the tax payer, to educate somebody
in an independent school. Government subsidy is much less and the parents pick
up a larger proportion. If all of those kids in independent schools went back
into the Government system tomorrow tax payers would be paying a lot more than
they are today. Its like if, if you can give say 20% of what it cost for a government
school and a kid goes to an independent school and the parents pay the remaining
80% their actually, the taxpayer is much better off. Having said that I think
that there are good Government schools, I think there are good independent schools.
My point is parents should have choice, parents should be able to decide where
they want to send their kids. If they can get a good Government school that
saves them a lot of money, if they believe that an independent school would
be better for their child and their able to pay for the money, then that should
be their choice as well.
JOURNALIST:
Fair enough. Now lets move onto your statements in relation to the tragic death
of David Hookes and the huge public outcry that has been occurring on this and
other radio stations in our network over the last, last week or so about a need
for a shake up in the security industry and these so called crowd controllers.
TREASURER:
Well look this is an absolute tragedy. David Hookes is somebody who has captured
the imagination of Australians, cricket lovers. He was very well known, as you
know as a radio commentator. I have met him on numbers of occasions and dealt
with him, he was a terrific guy and he was coaching Victoria and you just don’t
expect somebody to die in a senseless act of violence like that. The tragedy
probably is that there are other people who weren’t well known who had
died in similar accidents.
JOURNALIST:
…it happens everyday of the week, not people necessarily dying but being
bashed…
TREASURER:
…Every weekend, bashed outside pubs or bashed outside night clubs. And
maybe it just took somebody as famous as David Hookes to focus our attention
on this problem and makes you think of all those mothers and fathers and brothers
and sisters who’ve had somebody bashed in this situation. Their loss would
be no less. And one of the things that really worries parents and members of
the public is your bouncers are supposed to be there to stop fights and what
happens if a bouncer far from stopping it adds to it, what happens then? And
who is responsible, well of course I think the venues that employ the security
have got to be taking some responsibility in all of this and I said on radio
recently that if a venue has too many incidents maybe they should take a holiday
on their license for a while. And you have one bashing and it might be an accident
you have two bashings and it might be a bad crowd or three bashings within a
particular time maybe its time for a holiday on your license. Until such time
as the licensee and their security can get on top of the situation.
JOURNALIST:
I think it’s high time that the licensing was looked at in general.
My father used to say that if you can’t have all the fun you need by midnight
its time to go home. …
TREASURER:
Yes…
JOURNALIST:
You’ve too many venues open till 5 am. All of these violent bashings
occur somewhere between, or most of them occur between midnight and 4 or 5 in
the morning. I just really think Australia-wide that pubs and clubs have got
to really look at closing their doors at midnight.
TREASURER:
Well I don’t know about time limits but you do pick up when you watch
the news that there seems to be some clubs where there is regular violence right,
and I think one of the reasons for that is that some people know that if you
want a bit of action this is the place to go. I think there are some gangs that
regularly meet each other outside these clubs and if a club is so unfortunate
that its had numbers of bashings maybe we ought to just remove that venue for
a while. You know, bear this in mind, the clubs and the pubs are in the business
of providing entertainment and selling liquor and that’s fair enough and
they try to make a business out of it. But if in the course of that their product
fuels people or their venue fuels people to assault then it might be time to
have a bit of a holiday. Now, I put that forward. I hope, I see the Victorian
Government where the Hookes incident happened is now going to look at its security
industry in a much tighter way and I hope some good comes out of this because
you wouldn’t want another situation like this to occur would you…
JOURNALIST:
…Absolutely, no you wouldn’t although we had a very, very violent
situations occurring in Ipswich in the last couple of days as well. Similar,
similar sort of things no one dead fortunately.
You were actually bashed while you were at Uni weren’t you?
TREASURER:
Yes, yes but that wasn’t serious like this…
JOURNALIST:
All right, lets looks at interest rates. As we are getting out of time now.
Where do you see the future of interest rates?
TREASURER:
Well the Australian economy is growing pretty strongly, it’s growing
3 to 4% we think. The dollar is a bit of a dampener as I said earlier that’s
a bit of a dampener on our economic growth out there but our interest rates,
John are still pretty low. Home mortgage interest rate is 7% or a touch over
7% that’s low you and I can remember when it was 17%.
JOURNALIST:
Too right, who could forget it.
TREASURER:
Who could forget it. That’s when I started getting interested in economic
policy when I was paying 17 % under Keating. You can remember those days under
Keating. So its still pretty low, it is important I think that we try and keep
our interest rates as low as possible by running good disciplined budget policy
and we’ll have another surplus budget this year. So I think that it’s
important that we get the economic fundamentals right cause it’s important
for job creation in the future
JOURNALIST:
Certainly, I mean it is in the lap of the gods in the Reserve Bank, but do
you not see any exponential increases in the interest rates in the foreseeable
future?
TREASURER:
I think the bank has made the point that the Australian economy has grown and
maybe the world economy is picking up you know John. The Americans have been
through a recession and that has made the whole world economy weak, but if it
picks up that has given us a bit more strength. The bank responded to that last
year but I think the important thing for the future is if we keep our eye on
inflation, we keep inflation under control and consistent with our monetary
policy target then that will be a key indicator in relation to …
JOURNALIST:
…its getter harder and harder to own a home for young people particularly
in NSW with prices going sky high. Any plans to tamper with the first home buyers
grant or leave it as it is or perhaps supply a little more for the first home
buyers?
TREASURER:
Well, its in interesting one because we introduced that $7000 first home buyers
grant to help your first own buyer into the market and it has helped thousands,
tens of thousands probably hundreds of thousands of people. It is an interesting
question though Ross, what effect it has on price. There is some evidence that
by giving people a grant it may actually put up prices. We have asked the Productivity
Commission to look at this. You could get into a situation if you made it larger,
prices just went up because people have got more money to spend, prices could
go up. We have asked the Productivity Commission to have a look at that. But
I do think actually, that the housing market is coming off a bit. We had some
figures out during the week on lending finance we had some figures out previously
on finance approvals and my suspicion is that a bit of the heat is coming out
of the market. Auction clearance rates are in most capital cities going below
50%. There are always two perspective on this, if you own a home you want prices
to be high, if you don’t you want them to be low. But I think it might
be swinging a bit back towards the buyer in the next year or so.
JOURNALIST:
Mr Costello we have got about 30 seconds left but speaking of coming out of
left field, coming out of 22 left fields, apparently the defence forces own
22 golf courses, is that necessary?
TREASURER:
I am not sure that it’s 22 but it’s certainly a lot and I’ve
been looking and talking to the defence force about this for a very long period
of time. Some of the military land you can’t do any thing else.
JOURNALIST:
…Canungra, there is one there…
TREASURER:
Canungra, there is one in Canberra and they open it up to the public. There
is one out at Duntroon. But I wouldn’t call it core business, no I wouldn’t.
JOURNALIST:
Alright Mr Costello thanks for coming in this morning, enjoy your stay in Queensland
we look forward to seeing you when you get on your own campaign trail in the
not too far distance future.
TREASURER:
It will be a great pleasure to be back with you fellows…
JOURNALIST:
Thanks Mr Costello
TREASURER:
Thanks.